Royal Society warns bureaucracy is hampering British scientists

University scientists will remain overloaded with administrative work despite proposed changes to the method of assessing the quality of research they carry out, according to a report published today (19 May 2004) by the Royal Society.

In its submission to an inquiry into the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) by the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, the Royal Society backs new plans to review every six years the quality of research in each university. But the Society warns that the assessment process must be further simplified after the next RAE in 2008.

Lord May of Oxford, President of the Royal Society, said: “Whilst the Government must account for the public money invested in scientific research, researchers must be allowed to focus on pushing back the frontiers of knowledge, rather than filling in reams of paperwork. The new arrangements for assessing the quality of research in 2008 have been improved, but the system will need to be simplified further to stop unduly onerous administrative burdens from stifling the creativity of our researchers. Otherwise university departments will not just be run by administrators, they will be overrun by them.”

The publication of the Society’s submission coincides with the appearance today (19 May 2004) of the President of the Royal Society, Lord May of Oxford, in front of the Committee to give oral evidence to the inquiry.

The Society also welcomes moves by the Higher Education Funding Councils to produce research profiles for each university department in the RAE, to reduce ‘game-playing’ by universities in response to the competition for grades that determine research funding.

But the Society warns that the 2008 RAE will still fail to assess properly areas of multidisciplinary research that covers more than one subject, and collaborations by researchers at more than one institution.

The Society also endorses moves to include more people from commerce, industry and public service on the panels that assess the quality of university research, to ensure that the value of applied work is fully recognised.

The new arrangements should also decrease the incentive for universities to employ staff who can immediately contribute to RAE scores, and reduce the perceived disadvantages of employing researchers who work part-time or who have had career breaks.

For further information contact:
Bob Ward
Press Office
Royal Society
tel: 020 7451 2516 or 07811 320346

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Can HIIT's metabolic benefits last? New study explores post-exercise sustainability in diabetes