Colonoscopy remains the most sensitive test available for detection of colorectal polyps and cancer

Sep 7 2004

A study in today’s issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine reports a miss rate of approximately 10 percent for large (>5mm) precancerous polyps during conventional colonoscopy.

CT colonography (also called virtual colonoscopy) was used as the reference standard to assess complete colonoscopy in this study.

This 10 percent miss rate is identical to the largest previous study to address this issue using optical colonoscopy as its own reference standard. (Rex et al. Gastroenterology 1997:112:24-8.) According to the author this earlier study, Dr. Douglas Rex, who is currently President of the American College of Gastroenterology, “It has been clear for some time that colonoscopy is not a perfect test. On the other hand, based upon the literature to date, colonoscopy is still the best test and the current gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and prevention.”

Dr. Rex explains, “Three studies have shown that colonoscopy prevents about 80 percent of colorectal cancers from developing by removing precancerous polyps. There is no evidence that any radiographic test, including CT colonography, which is also known as virtual colonoscopy, prevents the development of colorectal cancer.”

According to Dr. Rex, “Colonoscopy remains the most sensitive test available for detection of colorectal polyps and cancer.” The four largest studies of CT colonography have been published in the last year, and three of the four studies showed very poor results for CT colonography compared to colonoscopy. Only the study by Pickhardt et al. showed results for CT colonography comparable to complete colonoscopy, and the reasons for the discrepancies between studies remain uncertain. No guideline group has yet endorsed CT colonography as appropriate for colorectal cancer screening.

There are considerable radiation exposure issues that should be questioned by patients undergoing CT scans, especially for screening. The implications of this exposure over time clearly needs to be better determined, particularly for a screening test which will be repeated.

The results of the Pickhardt study emphasize the importance of colonoscopy being performed by skilled practitioners. “Patients undergoing colonoscopy should identify doctors trained to perform colonoscopy in gastroenterology fellowship or surgical residency programs whenever possible,” says Rex. ACG has a brochure entitled “Your Doctor has Ordered a Colonoscopy: What Questions Should You Ask?”that can be used to help patients identify qualified colonoscopists and is available on the ACG Web site.

ACG endorses the recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer with regard to quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy. (Rex et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296-308.) Colonoscopists are encouraged to measure quality indicators, including those designed to maximize the accuracy of the examination. According to Dr. Rex, “The message for patients remains unchanged. Everyone over 50 should have a colonoscopy every ten years by an experienced and qualified endoscopist.”

http://www.acg.gi.org/