Study: Collecting duct carcinoma

Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare and highly aggressive variant of renal cell carcinoma that frequently presents with advanced disease, has few effective treatment options, and is associated with a poor prognosis.

Because of its rarity, most reports in the literature suffer from few patient numbers and little more than clinical anecdotes for treatment recommendations. In this report by Tokuda and colleagues, the collective experience of 281 institutions in Japan with collecting duct carcinoma are summarized as the result of a survey conducted from 2001 to 2003.

From 120 cases initially identified during the survey from 66 institutions, 81 cases were confirmed as collecting duct carcinoma based on independent histologic analysis. Mean patient age was 58.2 years, 71.6% of patients were male, and 65.4% of patients presented with symptoms related to their tumor. Median primary tumor size was 6 cm and 97.5% of tumors were grade 4. Of those that underwent a lymph node dissection during resection of the primary tumor, 44.2% had positive lymph nodes, and 32.1% of patients had distant metastasis at presentation. Surgery was utilized as a primary therapy in 98.8%. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 1 year, 5 year, and 10 year disease free survival was 69%, 34.3% and 13.7%, respectively, further emphasizing the aggressive nature of this tumor type. Primary tumor stage was organ confined (T1-T2) in 39%, T3a in 31%, T3b-c in 18.5%, T4 in 7.4%, and not available in 5%. Many varied adjuvant therapies were applied in appropriate patients, with no obvious responses except for one patient who had a partial response to a gemcitabine/carboplatin regimen.

Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare and aggressive variant of renal cell carcinoma. Therapeutic advances in this tumor type remain hampered by the rarity of the tumor that prevents the conduct of clinical trials that could evaluate potentially effective therapies. As a consequence, we are still relegated to clinical anecdotes as guides to therapeutic intervention in patients.

Written by Christopher G. Wood, MD - UroToday

Tokuda N, et al., J Urol 176: 40-43, 2006

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Dual screening for liver fibrosis and retinopathy in type 2 diabetes