St. Jude study holds promise for improving neuroblastoma treatment

A treatment for neuroblastoma that lands a one-two punch works best when the second punch is timed to take maximum advantage of the first one, according to results of studies at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

Neuroblastoma is a pediatric solid tumor that arises from cells in the peripheral nervous system.

The finding holds promise for improving neuroblastoma treatment by using the drug bevacizumab to block VEGF, a protein that stimulates blood vessel growth in tumors and then following with the chemotherapy drug topotecan, which depends on blood vessels to penetrate the tumor and kill the cancer cells. A report on this work appears in the current issue of "Clinical Cancer Research."

Results of the study are important because drugs such as bevacizumab are being evaluated in clinical trials for children with neuroblastoma. However, there are no standard guidelines for how much of the drug to give or when to give it. Such guidelines would be especially helpful for developing combination therapy with both bevacizumab and chemotherapy drugs, not only for neuroblastoma, but also for other tumors.

"The results of our study are a significant step toward establishing such guidelines," said Andrew Davidoff, M.D., director of surgical research at St. Jude, and the report's senior author.

The St. Jude team based their strategy on previous findings that suggested blocking VEGF at first improves the tumor's vasculature, or blood vessel system, by eliminating weak and faulty vessels, while temporarily sparing healthy, normal blood vessels.

"We observed in the mouse model of neuroblastoma that the maximum amount of topotecan reached the tumor and had maximum tumor-reducing effect if we waited three days after administering bevacizumab," Davidoff said. "Combination treatment of children with neuroblastoma should take into account that there is a window of opportunity for improving topotecan delivery after treatment with bevacizumab. Further studies should tell us how long that window is open."

Other authors of the study include Paxton Dickson, John Hamner, Thomas Sims, Charles Fraga, Catherine Ng, Surender Rajasekeran, Nikolaus Hagedorn, M. Beth McCarville and Clinton Stewart.

This work was supported in part by the Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy, the Assisi Foundation of Memphis, the U.S. Public Health Service Childhood Solid Tumor Program, a Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute and ALSAC.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Machine learning model predicts CDK4/6 inhibitor effectiveness in metastatic breast cancer