Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

Two papers setting out recommendations for the reporting of epidemiological research are published in this week's PLoS Medicine, along with several other journals.

The recommendations are the result of a 3 year international collaboration known as the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) Initiative.

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The recommendations are for what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study.

The papers, with lead authors Jan Vandenbroucke, Matthias Egger and Erik von Elm, describe the development of and rationale for a 22 item checklist that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. The checklist is intended for use by researchers, authors and editors during the publication of these articles but will also be of value to readers of these papers.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Minority genetic variation in tuberculosis offers new insights for improving outbreak tracking