Jan 22 2010
Researchers at Sansum Diabetes Research
Institute and University of California, Santa Barbara have concluded that
changing the height of a conventional insulin pump in relation to its
tubing and infusion set can significantly impact expected insulin delivery
rates. Such changes can occur during routine daily activities like
dressing, sleeping or showering. The study, "Siphon Effects of Continuous
Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Pump Delivery Performance," evaluated the
siphon or hydrostatic pressure action effects on continuous subcutaneous
insulin infusion and was published in the January issue of Journal of
Diabetes Science and Technology.
"In this study we found a pronounced siphon effect in conventional insulin
pumps, which caused significant fluctuations in the accuracy of insulin
delivery rates when the pump position was moved higher or lower relative to
its tubing and infusion site," said lead investigator Howard Zisser, MD,
Director of Clinical Research and Diabetes Technology at the Sansum
Diabetes Research Institute in Santa Barbara, CA. "Insulin pump therapy
allows for precise control of insulin delivery for patients with type 1
diabetes. The unintended fluctuation in insulin delivery, which may arise
from pump movement during normal daily use, can increase blood glucose
variability, a risk factor for the progression of complications of
diabetes. The effect of hydrostatic pressure was most significant at low
basal rates and therefore these findings may be particularly important for
pediatric diabetes patients, who often use insulin pumps at low basal
rates."
The investigators reached this finding by quantifying the effect of
hydrostatic pressure (the pressure exerted on a portion of a column of
fluid as a result of the weight of the fluid above it) on insulin delivery
during bolus dosages, basal rates and static changes in insulin pumps. They
tested conventional insulin pumps from Medtronic Diabetes (MiniMed 512 &
515, which uses 110 cm tubing) and Smiths Medical (Deltec Cozmo 1700,
which uses 80 cm tubing), and also compared them to the tubing-free pump
from Insulet Corporation (the OmniPod System).
The researchers found that raising or lowering a conventional insulin pump,
to the full extent of its tubing, can significantly affect the accuracy of
insulin delivery, especially at low basal infusion rates. The most
pronounced differences were seen during basal delivery in the Cozmo and
MiniMed pumps. For the 1U/hr rate, differences ranged from 74.5% of the
expected delivery when the pumps were below the pipettes and pumping upward
to 123.3% when the pumps were above the pipettes and pumping downward. For
the 1.5U/hr rate, differences ranged from 86.7% to 117.0% when the pumps
were below or above the pipettes, respectively.
In contrast, the OmniPod, which has no external tubing, was the least
affected by pumping orientation and direction. With the OmniPod System,
the 1U/hr rate differences only ranged from 98.3% when its delivery cannula
was in a level pumping position to 101.3% when the cannula was in an upward
pumping position. For the 1.5U/hr rate, its differences only ranged from
96.0% in a level pumping position to 102.5% in an upward pumping position.
The researchers measured the change in the fluid level in an in-line
graduated glass pipette when the Cozmo and MiniMed pumps were moved either
up or down to its maximum length in relation to the end of the
tubing/pipette. For the OmniPod, the unit was held in a clamp vertically
with the delivery cannula up for "upward" pumping position and the delivery
cannula down for the "downward" pumping position. The OmniPod was
horizontal for the level pumping position.
SOURCE: Insulet Corporation