Study shows ActiveHealth's VBID programs increase adherence to medications

ActiveHealth Management (ActiveHealth®), a subsidiary of Aetna (NYSE: AET), today announced the publication of a paper in the February issue of Health Affairs. The paper demonstrates that properly structured value-based insurance design (VBID) programs can be effective at increasing adherence to drug regimens for specific chronic medical conditions without increasing overall costs. The analysis also suggests that, by targeting outreach to members who need it most, additional cost savings can be achieved, not only in averting serious health events but through fewer disability days, less absenteeism and greater worker productivity.

“Impact Of Decreasing Copayments On Medication Adherence Within A Disease Management Environment”

The ActiveHealth program, currently available to employers and health plans, can couple a VBID incentive with a disease management program. When individuals with chronic conditions engage in disease management nurse coaching, they are eligible for reduced co-payments on their medications. The program is designed to remove financial barriers to medication compliance and encourage individuals to participate in nurse coaching.

“As employers face increased pressure to keep their health care costs in check, increasing copayments are often considered as a way to lower employers’ costs. However, the increased financial barrier to employees may lead to negative and more costly health events for the employee and employer. Programs that combine disease management and VBID are proving effective at helping employers slow the rate of growth in health care spending, while offering employees valuable benefits that help them stay well and productive at work,” said Stephen Rosenberg, M.D., senior vice president for Outcomes Research at ActiveHealth, and an author of the paper.

Highlights of the Health Affairs paper

Methods

  • In January 2005, a large employer reduced copayments for five classes of drugs used to treat serious chronic conditions: ACE Inhibitors and beta blockers used to treat high blood pressure and other heart disease risk factors, diabetes medications, statins which help lower cholesterol and inhaled corticosteroids, used to help manage asthma.
  • The employer reduced copayments for generic medications from $5 to $0, preferred brand name drugs from $25 to $12.50 and non-preferred brand name drugs from $45 to $22.50.
  • All patients who were already taking these medications were eligible for enrollment in the VBID program and the reduction in copayments. Copay relief was also available to people who were not currently taking the medications but were identified as patients who would benefit from its use, once their doctors agreed and provided prescriptions.

Results

  • The VBID program increased adherence to medications by three percentage points, resulting in an average increase in pharmacy costs to the employer of $7.75 per employee, per month.
  • But, as a result of this program, the employer reduced its costs for other (non-drug) health care services like hospital admissions by the same amount, so that there was no overall increase.
  • The analysis shows that better compliance with medications can avert serious or catastrophic health events, leading to reduced costs and potentially healthier and more productive employees.

Programs Built on Patented Technology

ActiveHealth’s patented technology, the CareEngine® System, powers Active Disease ManagementSM and ActiveHealth’s VBID program, which is known as Active Benefit DesignSM. The CareEngine creates a personal health profile for each individual using claims and other data, and compares the profile to the evidence-based literature. As part of this process, the CareEngine identifies the individuals whose clinical profile indicates they could most benefit from disease management nurse coaching, as well as the individuals who would most benefit from a medication included in the incentive program. Program medications were selected based on the large body of evidence-based medical literature documenting their cost effectiveness in the treatment of common chronic conditions.

The paper was written by Michael E. Chernew, professor in the Department of Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School, Iver A. Juster, senior vice president for Informatics at ActiveHealth, Mayur Shah, formerly employed at ActiveHealth, Arnold Wegh, senior informatics analyst at ActiveHealth, Stephen Rosenberg, senior vice president for Outcomes Research at ActiveHealth, Michael C. Sokol, corporate medical director for Merck and Company, Kristine Yu-Isenberg, associate director in Regional Outcomes Research at Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs and A. Mark Fendrick, professor in the Division of General Medicine at the University of Michigan.

The current paper complements an earlier study published in Health Affairs by researchers from ActiveHealth, Harvard Medical School and the University of Michigan. That study showed that lowering co-pays for certain classes of drugs improves medication compliance. The study demonstrated that ActiveHealth’s VBID incentive can be effective in increasing compliance with important medications and can complement ActiveHealth’s disease management program.

Source:

ActiveHealth Management

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study finds health care evaluations of large language models lacking in real patient data and bias assessment