Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) President and CEO
Mark Merritt released the following statement on today’s Federal
Workforce, Postal Service, and District of Columbia Subcommittee on
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on the Federal
Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP):
“Regrettably, the FEHBP Prescription Drug Integrity, Transparency,
and Cost Savings Act (H.R. 4489) would undermine many of the
cost-saving tools used in FEHBP and disrupt prescription drug benefits
for 8 million federal employees, retirees, and their families.”
“The FEHBP has long been touted as a gold standard for employee benefits
and is often cited as the model for health insurance reform efforts at
the state and national levels. A recent survey by the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) – the agency administering FEHBP – found that
federal employees are overwhelmingly satisfied with their current health
benefits by a 7-1 margin. This is significant, as pharmacy benefits are
the most often-used part of the program.
“Regrettably, the FEHBP Prescription Drug Integrity, Transparency,
and Cost Savings Act (H.R. 4489) would undermine many of the
cost-saving tools used in FEHBP and disrupt prescription drug benefits
for 8 million federal employees, retirees, and their families.
“Currently, FEHBP relies on the same sophisticated pharmacy benefit
managers (PBMs) used by Fortune 500 employers, Medicare Part D, and
other successful programs to improve affordability. PBMs employ an array
of tools to combat rising drug costs, including promoting a greater
reliance on generic drugs, expanded use of home delivery, and more
competition generated through formularies. These proven tools have
helped drastically slow growth in drug expenditures.
“Specific provisions in the bill that would undermine cost-saving tools
and reduce choices for enrollees would:
-
Force FEHBP to stop managing drug benefits like Fortune 500 companies
and unions and instead operate more like the Medicaid program for the
poor, which is bankrupting state governments across the country.
-
Pay pharmacies at a loss based on the government pricing formula
currently used by Medicaid, which would cause many pharmacies to
reconsider participating in the program.
-
Undermine OPM, which already has the authority to impose all of the
bill’s provisions without seeking any new authority from Congress.
-
Interfere with existing state laws by preventing pharmacies from
automatically substituting lower cost generic drugs. The bill would
also restrict drug substitution based on safety if the replacement
drug was ‘higher in cost.’
-
Decrease competition and access by effectively banning some PBMs from
participating in FEHBP. For example, PBMs that are partially owned by
chain drugstores would be banned from the program, while PBMs owned by
health plans would be forbidden from even making an operating margin.
-
Require plans to send FEHBP enrollees — for each and every
prescription — confidential pricing information that would undermine
PBMs’ ability to extract discounts from drug makers and drugstores.”