$296 million guilty plea from Boston Scientific in relation to Guidant defibrillator case

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a life saving battery operated device much like a pacemaker that is placed near the heart in a minor surgical procedure. This device detects abnormal heart rates and rhythms in the patient and delivers an electric shock to make the heart beat normally again. These save millions of people in the US and all over the world from sudden death.

In a new development Guidant LLC, a unit of Boston Scientific Corp, has been implicated in short circuiting failures of three models of their ICDs. The 20,146 devices at issue in the criminal case are Ventak Prizm 2 and Contak Renewal 1 and 2 defibrillators. Guidant have pleaded guilty to the criminal charges on Monday according to the U.S. Justice Department.

According to the DOJ Guidant was guilty of withholding information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that could have resulted in the failures in some of the devices. After a death of a patient in 2004, Guidant sent out a product update to advise doctors that the yellow warning screen warned of a potentially serious problem in the device in 2005. This change made to reduce the health risk was not reported as product correction but as product update. Guidant broke the law by not notifying the FDA about the change within 10 days.

Guidant has agreed to pay a combined criminal penalty of more than $296 million, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota said in a statement on Monday. Within this amount a $42 million in forfeiture funds is also included and the victims could petition the Justice Department for a share. These charges were first announced last November and Boston Scientific already recorded a third-quarter charge of $294 million in relation to the fine, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Prosecutors also said most of the plaintiffs' civil claims have been settled already and they presumably are receiving compensation.

Paul Donovan, Boston Scientific spokesman said, "Today's court action was a procedural step necessary for the completion of the agreement in principle we announced in November."

According to the FDA Guidant's guilty plea and the proposed resolution is the largest criminal penalty ever imposed on a device manufacturer for violating the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Last month, Boston Scientific halted all sales of heart- rhythm devices in connection with this. There have been 1300 jobs or 10% of its of its non-manufacturing workforce. The stocks of the company have also fallen steadily in 17 months on March 15th after the company said it stopped sales of defibrillators because of a documentation error.

According to US District Judge Donovan Frank, the decision on the plea will be announced within 3 weeks whether to reject the plea deal, accept it as written, or accept it with modifications.

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). $296 million guilty plea from Boston Scientific in relation to Guidant defibrillator case. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20100406/24296-million-guilty-plea-from-Boston-Scientific-in-relation-to-Guidant-defibrillator-case.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "$296 million guilty plea from Boston Scientific in relation to Guidant defibrillator case". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20100406/24296-million-guilty-plea-from-Boston-Scientific-in-relation-to-Guidant-defibrillator-case.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "$296 million guilty plea from Boston Scientific in relation to Guidant defibrillator case". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20100406/24296-million-guilty-plea-from-Boston-Scientific-in-relation-to-Guidant-defibrillator-case.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. $296 million guilty plea from Boston Scientific in relation to Guidant defibrillator case. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20100406/24296-million-guilty-plea-from-Boston-Scientific-in-relation-to-Guidant-defibrillator-case.aspx.

Comments

  1. Bill Keene Bill Keene United States says:

    I think the fine that was imposed on Guidant should be mostly shared with the patients due to the fact that wveryone who had one had to live in fear until they had their defibrillator replaced. My wife, Georgia, had her's replaced on July 8, 2005. Twenty-one days later, she received a letter from Guidant telling her that her's maight be defective. She found out about the defects from friends and the news media. Shame on Guidant. Also, I think the litigation in Minnesota was far too low in monetary settlements. But, as always, big money and liberal judges had to have their way once again.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Ablation may offer better outcomes than medication for ventricular tachycardia