USPTO rules against claims in LifeWatch '878 patent

Medicomp, Inc. confirmed that it has received an initial ruling by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to reject all claims in regards to LifeWatch patent 7,542,878 (the '878 patent).

In response to a lawsuit LifeWatch brought against Medicomp for patent infringement, Medicomp requested that the USPTO reexamine the '878 patent and a second LifeWatch patent, numbered 5,730,143 (the '143 patent), based on its belief that the patents are invalid and should not have been granted. In the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, LifeWatch had sought a preliminary injunction to prevent Medicomp from marketing its Medicomp SAVI® Wireless mobile cardiac telemetry product. After the USPTO granted Medicomp's reexamination request of the '878 patent, the court denied the preliminary injunction sought by LifeWatch, allowing Medicomp to proceed with the launch of its Medicomp SAVI® Wireless mobile cardiac telemetry product. If the rejection of the claims in the '878 patent by the USPTO stands, the patent will be revoked. Additionally, the USPTO has ordered reexamination of all claims in the '143 patent, but has not yet issued a first Office Action with a rejection.

While these are only the initial findings of the USPTO concerning these two patents, Medicomp is pleased that the USPTO has accepted its arguments.

Dr. Dan Balda, President of Medicomp, stated, "We are extremely excited about this news as we are eager to get this matter behind us so we can resume our focus on providing patients and healthcare providers with what we believe to be the best mobile cardiac telemetry technology offering in the industry."

Stephen Maebius, a patent attorney with Foley & Lardner LLP working on this case, added, "Although this was a time-consuming and expensive for the company, we are pleased that the USPTO has ordered reexamination against both patents asserted in the litigation. If the USPTO issues and maintains rejections against all claims in the reexaminations of the '878 and '143 patents, then the patents will ultimately be rendered void and inapplicable to any LifeWatch products."

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.