Vertos Medical announces 12-week data from MiDAS I clinical study for lumbar spinal stenosis

Medical device company Vertos Medical Inc. has announced the unveiling of 12-week clinical data from its prospective, 75-patient MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to open Surgery) study that further validate the safety and efficacy of mild for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Consistent with the positive six-week study results released in March and May, the new MiDAS I data demonstrate that mild patients continued to experience statistically significant improvement in pain, physical function and mobility 12 weeks following treatment. The study's medical monitors also concluded that mild is safe, with no reports of major adverse events related to the procedure or devices.

“We believe these new findings will further increase physician confidence in and adoption of mild in clinical practice.”

The new MiDAS I results were presented by study Co-Medical Monitor David Caraway, M.D., Ph.D. (St. Mary's Pain Relief Center, Huntington, W. Va.) at the International Spine Intervention Society meeting in Maui, Hawaii on July 17.

"This new data is quite encouraging, as it shows us that mild is able to provide LSS patients with lasting, statistically significant improvement across all key outcomes measures," said Dr. Caraway. "With mild, physicians and patients now have an earlier, safer alternative for lumbar spine decompression that achieves sustained relief without the traditional risk profile."

Key outcome measures at twelve weeks included changes in Visual Analog Score (VAS), which measures pain; changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which assesses functional ability; as well as patient-reported responses to the SF-12v2® Quality of Life Survey and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ). The latter are widely accepted tools for measuring relative change in patient symptom severity, physical function as well as overall satisfaction with the results of the intervention.

The data showed that MiDAS I participants achieved:

  • Sustained pain improvement (VAS). Study protocol defined success as a minimum two-point VAS improvement from baseline. The 12-week data showed an average improvement of 3.68 points from baseline across all patients. This compares to 3.6 points found at six weeks post-treatment.
  • Even greater improvement in functional ability (ODI). Study participants achieved an average ODI improvement from baseline of 18.6 points at 12 weeks, as compared with the 17.9 points found at six weeks. Both scores are noteworthy, as a U.S. Food and Drug Administration panel on orthopedic and rehabilitation devices has given guidance that a minimum 15-point change in ODI score from baseline is clinically significant.
  • Sustained improvement in quality of life (Physical Component Score, SF-12v2). At 12 weeks, participants reported not only a statistically significant improvement from baseline, but also a clinically relevant improvement of greater than two times the minimally important clinical difference (MID). These results mirror outcomes observed six weeks post-treatment.
  • Sustained improvement in patient satisfaction, overall symptom severity and physical function (ZCQ). At 12 weeks, participants reported an average satisfaction rating of 2.02 on a scale from 1 (highest) to 4 (lowest). This rating was unchanged from six weeks. In addition, improvement in overall symptom severity and physical function (as with SF-12v2) was statistically significant at both six and 12 weeks post-treatment.

"The 12-week MiDAS I data represent a meaningful validation of mild's role in the early treatment of LSS, where traditionally physicians have had to balance the risks of open, more invasive procedures for lasting effectiveness," said James M. Corbett, president and chief executive officer of Vertos. "We believe these new findings will further increase physician confidence in and adoption of mild in clinical practice."

Peer-reviewed publication of comprehensive MiDAS I study data is anticipated later this year. Based on an extensive scientific literature review, MiDAS I has been shown to employ the most comprehensive array of validated patient reported outcomes tools in LSS studies submitted for publication in recent years.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study finds limited evidence for massage therapy's effectiveness in pain relief