Soda taxes – would they do any good?

According to new research from Duke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Graduate Medical School imposing higher taxes on sodas and other sweetened drinks would lead to only minimal weight loss among most people and would have no effect on weight among consumers in the highest and lowest income groups.

The study was led by Eric Finkelstein associate professor of health services at Duke-NUS who looked at differential impact on calories and weight of a 20 percent and 40 percent tax on sodas and other sweetened beverages among different income groups. The study was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine. Earlier studies have shown that excess consumption of sugary drinks leads to weight gain and contributes to the epidemic of obesity in the U.S.

For this study the team obtained information in a database of U.S. households that tracked their store-bought food and beverage purchases over the course of a year. This included the size of the household, demographics and the cost and quantities of foods and beverages purchased by brand and UPC code. Drinks brought included carbonated and non-carbonated drinks, including sodas, diet carbonated beverages, sports/energy drinks, fruit drinks, fruit juice and skim and whole milk.

Finkelstein said, “If consumers switch from Coke to Diet Coke or water there would be no offsetting gains… If they switch to other high calorie drinks, the effects of the tax would be diluted.” They estimate that if the prices of these sugared drinks were raised by 20 percent, this would generate about $1.5 billion per year in tax revenue in the U.S.; a tax that raised prices by 40 percent would generate $2.5 billion per year, at a cost to the average household of about $28.

Co-author Chen Zhen a research economist at RTI International added that taxes are regressive in the sense that the tax paid as a percentage of household income is greater for lower income households than for higher income households. He added, “However, because poor households purchase far more generic brands that are significantly cheaper, they pay a smaller share of the total tax revenue.”

Results show that because of switching from sugared sodas to other beverages, the effect on total calories and weight is relatively small. A tax that raises prices by 20 percent generates a daily average reduction of 6.9 calories. Over the course of a year, this equates to no more than 0.7 pounds per household member. A 40 percent tax would reduce daily calories by 12.5 calories and generate annual weight losses of up to 1.3 pounds per person per year. Finkelstein said, “Although small, given the rising trend in obesity rates, especially among youth, any strategy that shows even modest weight loss should be considered… Extending the tax to restaurants and vending machines would generate more tax revenue and perhaps greater weight losses.” Most of the weight losses were generated from middle income groups. “Higher income groups can afford to pay the tax so they are unaffected, and lower income groups likely avoid the effects of the tax by purchasing generic versions, waiting for sales, buying in bulk, or by other cost-saving strategies,” Finkelstein said.

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), two-thirds of the U.S. population is overweight or obese and obesity costs the U.S. an estimated $147 billion per year. Obesity is a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some types of cancer.

Dr. Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University added that such studies can only simulate how people might react to soda taxes. “The fact is that nobody has been able to see how people will really respond under these conditions.”

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2020, April 03). Soda taxes – would they do any good?. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 25, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101213/Soda-taxes-would-they-do-any-good.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Soda taxes – would they do any good?". News-Medical. 25 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101213/Soda-taxes-would-they-do-any-good.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Soda taxes – would they do any good?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101213/Soda-taxes-would-they-do-any-good.aspx. (accessed November 25, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2020. Soda taxes – would they do any good?. News-Medical, viewed 25 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20101213/Soda-taxes-would-they-do-any-good.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Fermented kimchi may help combat obesity by regulating gut microbiota