With cancer care costs rising at an unprecedented rate, The US Oncology Network, one of the nation's largest networks of community-based oncologists dedicated to advancing cancer care in America, reported a study that identified areas where both the cost and quality of care could be improved. The new study titled, "Benchmarks for value in cancer care: an analysis of a large commercial population," found that the key areas driving the spike in costs are chemotherapy, hospital admissions, emergency room visits and aggressive end of life care. In fact, cancer patients in a commercially insured population receiving chemotherapy averaged $111,000 per year in total medical and pharmacy costs – about four times the cost of cancer patients not receiving chemotherapy and nearly 26 times the cost of non-oncology patients. Plus, more than half of the cancer patients in the study received chemotherapy within the last 30 days of life.
This study was chosen to be published in the "State of Oncology" supplement of the peer-reviewed Journal of Oncology Practice because it was found to cover an increasingly important issue for oncologists.
"I'm pleased that the Journal of Oncology Practice decided to feature this study because the unsustainable ballooning costs of cancer care is an issue that needs to be addressed sooner rather than later," said Michael Kolodziej, M.D., lead author, oncologist with New York Oncology Hematology, and chairman of The US Oncology Network Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. "This study shows that the cancer care community needs to focus on delivering high-quality, evidence-based medicine with a focus on disease management that emphasizes the importance of advance care planning and end of life support. I believe oncologists should look into working with payers to better manage costs and improve the quality of care each patient receives by following evidence-based treatment guidelines."
The US Oncology Network partnered with Milliman, Inc. to evaluate the prevalence and costs associated with cancer treatment in a commercially insured population. This was done by utilizing Medstat 2007, a large commercial insurance database that contains private sector health data and claims information for about 14 million insured lives from approximately 100 payers. Fourteen cancer diagnoses were included and evaluated in ten cancer groups including Lung, Breast, Colon, Rectal, Pancreatic, Ovarian, Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Prostate. Study endpoints included analyzing the cost of treatment over one year and costs incurred at the end of life.
"The study also showed that in a commercial population, cancer is not a common diagnosis – less than one percent," said Dr. Kolodziej. "However, money spent on cancer patients made up ten percent of spending by the payer. This high cost of cancer care is exacerbated by expensive drugs and care with little value."