Promising preliminary data for axitinib in metastatic kidney cancer

By Laura Cowen

Preliminary study data show that axitinib may be an effective first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), particularly in patients with high therapeutic drug exposure and a rise in blood pressure during the first 2 weeks of treatment, researchers report.

Brian Rini (Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA) reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Annual Meeting, held in Chicago, Illinois, USA, that between 40% and 56% of patients with treatment-naïve mRCC experienced an objective response following treatment with axitinib.

The researchers explain that axitinib is a potent selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, but pharmacokinetic and phramcodynamic variability can mean that some patients have suboptimal drug exposures at the standard 5 mg twice daily dose.

Rini and team hypothesized that dose titration based on individual tolerability may optimize exposure and improve outcomes.

To test this hypothesis, the researchers initially treated 203 mRCC patients with axitinib 5 mg twice daily for a 4-week lead-in period (cycle 1).

Then, patients with blood pressure (BP) at or below 150/90 mmHg for 2 consecutive weeks, no axitinib-related toxicities above grade 2, no dose reductions, and two or fewer antihypertensive medications were randomly assigned to receive axitinib 5 mg twice daily plus dose titration with either axitinib to a maximum of 10 mg twice daily (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Those ineligible for randomization continued with the same dose (arm C).

In all, 112 patients were randomly assigned to arms A or B, and 91 to arm C.

Rini reported that the objective response rate (ORR) was 40.2% in arms A+B combined and 56.0% in C. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 13.7 months in arms A+B and 12.2 months in arm C.

He said that it is currently unknown whether the lower ORR was driven by the patients assigned to placebo titration. This question will be answered in the final analysis of study data.

A subanalysis performed on day 15 of cycle 1 showed that patients with drug exposure above therapeutic threshold (area under the curve at 24 hours ≥300 ng/h per mL; n=27) had significantly longer mPFS and higher ORR than those with sub-therapeutic exposure (n=25), at 13.9 versus 8.3 months, and 59% versus 48%, respectively.

In addition, patients with mean diastolic BP (DBP) increases of 15 mmHg or more (n=18) per ambulatory BP measurement had higher ORR than those with mean DBP increases below 15 mmHg (n=36), at 61% versus 53%.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Comments

  1. Fred Fred United States says:

    My BP went way up as I began using Inlyta and, according to the lump on my neck, which is sort of my 'marker', it has been very effective. I am in my 3rd month using Inlyta and it has been very effective...just wish I didn't have to pay full price for it.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New vaccine shows potential in preventing recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer