Lessons learned from transfusion refusal

By Sarah Guy

Jehovah's Witness patients (Witnesses) who refuse blood transfusions during cardiac surgery are not at risk for surgical complications or long-term mortality compared with non-Witnesses who receive transfusions, report US researchers.

Witnesses had fewer postoperative myocardial infarctions, fewer additional operations for bleeding, and a lower hazard for in-hospital death, says the team.

The findings indicate that the severe blood-conserving management strategies used in Witness patients could benefit other patient groups, suggest Colleen Koch (Cleveland Clinic, Ohio) and co-investigators.

"Witnesses hold beliefs that disallow blood product transfusion and therefore offer a natural experiment in severe blood conservation," they explain in the Archives of Internal Medicine, adding that blood conservation practices include preoperative use of erythropoietin, iron, and B-complex vitamins, and intraoperative use of antifibrinolytics.

The study cohort included 322 Witness and 48,986 non-Witness cardiac surgery patients, the latter of whom received transfusions, who were followed up for a respective mean 9.6 and 8.6 years.

The researchers report that the two groups showed similar rates of in-hospital mortality, at 3.1% of Witnesses and 4.5% of non-Witnesses, but Witnesses had significantly lower rates of additional operations for bleeding (3.7 vs 7.3%), myocardial infarction (0.3 vs 2.8%), and prolonged ventilation (6.0 vs 16.0%), than non-Witnesses.

There was a trend toward a lower risk for death/improved survival after 1 year among Witnesses (95% survival vs 89%); however, by 20 years' follow up, mortality rates did not differ significantly from those for non-Witnesses (66 vs 68%).

One important potential limitation of the study is highlighted in an accompanying commentary, by Victor Ferraris (University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington).

"Witnesses who undergo cardiac surgery are likely a healthier subgroup of Witnesses because those who are believed by their surgeons to require blood transfusion to survive cardiac surgery presumably never go to the operating room," he wrote.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Comments

  1. Janet Tobin Janet Tobin United States says:

    Jehovah's Witnesses fare better with bloodless surgeries that are elective non emergency.Tens of thousands have died in the emergency room from traumatic blood loss.

  2. Danny Haszard Danny Haszard United States says:

    It is misleading to imply that there is NO RISK refusing blood transfusions which is how the Jehovah's Witnesses Watchtower will spin it.
    It's only *elective surgery* for patients who are not in ER bleeding to death and in a modern hospital that has all the latest blood conservation gadgets.How safe is all the thousands of pints of blood that Jehovah's Witnesses do use?

    Jehovahs Witnesses  take blood products now in 2012.
    They take all fractions of blood.This includes hemoglobin, albumin, clotting factors, cryosupernatant and cryo-poor too, and many, many, others.
    If one adds up all the blood fractions the JWs takes, it equals a whole unit of blood. Any, many of these fractions are made from thousands upon thousands of units of donated blood.
    Jehovah’s Witnesses can take Bovine *cows blood* as long as it is euphemistically called synthetic Hemopure.
    Jehovah's Witnesses now accept every fraction of blood except the membrane of the red blood cell. JWs now accept blood transfusions.
    The fact that the JW blood issue is so unclear is downright dangerous in the emergency room.
    More than 50,000 Jehovah's Witnesses dead from Watchtowers deadly arbitrary blood ban. That is 50 times more than died at Jonestown massacre,some estimates run as high as 100,000 dead
    ---
    Danny Haszard

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Long-term air pollution exposure linked to increased risk of acute kidney injury and mortality