Hemorrhage risk ‘higher than reported’ for AF warfarin users

By Lynda Williams, Senior medwireNews Reporter

Real-world findings for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients using warfarin point to a significantly higher risk for hemorrhage than reported for clinical trials.

Data for 125,195 AF patients aged 66 years and older who used warfarin between 1997 and 2008 gave an overall rate of hemorrhage of 3.8% per person-year, peaking in the first 30 days of treatment at 11.8% per person-year, and 3.4% per person-year thereafter.

For patients with a CHADS2 score of 4 or above, denoting a high risk for stroke in AF patients, the risk for hemorrhage in the first 30 days was 16.7% per person-year, and 6.0% per person-year thereafter, say Tara Gomes (University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and co-authors.

By comparison, patients with a low CHADS2 risk for stroke had lower than average rates of hemorrhage at 1.8% per person-year for a score of 0 and 2.5% per person-year for a score of 1. The rate of hemorrhage was also significantly higher in patients aged over 75 years than younger individuals (4.6 vs 2.9% per person-year).

"The rate of hemorrhage in our study is considerably higher than those reported in randomized controlled trials of warfarin therapy, which have ranged between 1% and 3% per person-year," the team writes in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

"This difference is likely due to the strict inclusion criteria and close monitoring of patients in clinical trials and the average age of our participants being older than that of patients included in trials."

The patients, all residents of Ontario, were aged a median of 77 years when warfarin was initiated, and 69% had a CHADS2 score of 2 or above for stroke at this time.

Overall, 8.7% of patients attended hospital with hemorrhage over 5 years of follow up, with 18.1% of these individuals dying in hospital or within 7 days of discharge. Mortality was significantly more common after intracranial bleeding than upper or lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage or bleeding at other sites (47.1 vs 14.4, 15.0, and 12.6%, respectively).

"Our study provides timely estimates of warfarin-related adverse events that may be useful to clinicians, patients and policy-makers in light of newly approved and emerging anticoagulant therapies," Gomes et al conclude.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Edoxaban proves effective in preventing blood clots, stroke after heart valve surgery