Pelvic floor exercises after RP ‘sufficient’

Performing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) both before and after radical prostatectomy (RP) is no more effective at reducing postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) than performing the exercises after surgery, report researchers.

In a randomized controlled trial, duration of postoperative UI was no shorter among patients who performed PFMT before and after surgery than among those who only started PFMT 3 days after their operation, say Inge Geraerts (KU Leuven, Belgium) and colleagues.

Of the 180 men who underwent either open RP or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP, 91 received weekly 30-minute sessions of guided PFMT as well as completing daily exercises at home for 3 weeks prior to undergoing surgery (intervention group). After RP, they visited the hospital once a week to perform individual guided PFMT with digital or electromagnetic biofeedback. The control group comprised 89 patients who only participated in this postoperative training and monitoring.

As reported in European Urology, the time taken for patients to reach urinary continence (defined as 3 consecutive days of 0 g urine loss on 24-hour pad test) did not significantly differ between the men in the intervention group and those in the control group after 12 months. Only six patients remained incontinent after 1 year, two from the intervention group and four from the control group. However, those in the intervention group reported better quality of life regarding incontinence impact at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.

Based on the 24-hour test, those in the intervention group had comparable cumulative incidence rates for continence and similar mean amounts of urine loss at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after RP, as those in the control group.

Furthermore, Cox regression analysis showed no significant between-group difference in time to reaching continence, after adjustment for age and type of RP surgery. Similarly, the point prevalence of urinary continence (defined as ≤ 1 g on the 1-hour pad test and using the visual analog scale) was comparable between the intervention and control group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RP.

Moreover, the team did not record any differences in voiding symptoms between the two groups at any of these timepoints, as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score.

"Standard postoperative continence rehabilitation using a strict pelvic floor reduction scheme could not be improved by adding three preoperative sessions of PFMY," concludes the team.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Sally Robertson

Written by

Sally Robertson

Sally first developed an interest in medical communications when she took on the role of Journal Development Editor for BioMed Central (BMC), after having graduated with a degree in biomedical science from Greenwich University.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Robertson, Sally. (2020, April 02). Pelvic floor exercises after RP ‘sufficient’. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 23, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20130130/Pelvic-floor-exercises-after-RP-sufficient.aspx.

  • MLA

    Robertson, Sally. "Pelvic floor exercises after RP ‘sufficient’". News-Medical. 23 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20130130/Pelvic-floor-exercises-after-RP-sufficient.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Robertson, Sally. "Pelvic floor exercises after RP ‘sufficient’". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20130130/Pelvic-floor-exercises-after-RP-sufficient.aspx. (accessed November 23, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Robertson, Sally. 2020. Pelvic floor exercises after RP ‘sufficient’. News-Medical, viewed 23 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20130130/Pelvic-floor-exercises-after-RP-sufficient.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Fish oil speeds muscle recovery in aging rats, suggesting potential benefits for humans