Study evaluates durability of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

The initial success rates of the most durable surgery for a common condition in women declines over the long-term, according to data published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The procedure, abdominal sacrocolpopexy, is used to manage pelvic organ prolapse, a widespread but little-known condition that occurs when the vaginal wall protrudes outside of the vaginal opening.

More than 225,000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse. The cost for these procedures is more than $1 billion per year, yet little until now has been known about its long-term effectiveness.

The goal of this study was to compare the long-term anatomic and symptomatic success rates in women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy up to seven years following the procedure and whether these factors were affected by an associated surgery to prevent incontinence, a common side effect of prolapse procedures.

The study found that anatomic support failure rates increased over time and mesh erosion, a complication of this surgery, occurred in 10.5 percent of patients by seven years. The study also revealed that adding a procedure to prevent incontinence following surgery decreased but did not completely eliminate subsequent urinary incontinence.

Most (95%) women in the study did not seek retreatment for prolapse once they experienced loss of vaginal support in the seven years following an abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Authors reported that women may have found the initial treatment adequate, because abdominal sacrocolpopexy generally provides relief of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, such as pelvic pressure or a bulge, despite progressive loss of anatomic support.

"While these findings highlight the reality of the condition treated by this procedure, abdominal sacrocolpopexy may still be a good option for some women. Physicians also can use this information to better counsel patients based on individual needs," said Linda Brubaker, MD, MS, study investigator and dean, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. "Fortunately, this procedure is now available minimally invasively. We also have vaginal reconstructive procedures that may be good alternatives for patients who do not choose to undergo a traditional abdominal sacrocolpopexy."

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Researchers uncover why typically normal protein drives prostate cancer