Fluoride added to water supplies reduces tooth decay in children

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral in water and many foods. In addition, fluoride is intentionally added to the public water supplies, because it has been demonstrated that communities with fluoride added to their water supplies have significantly reduced incidence of tooth decay in children. Fluoride makes teeth more resistant to the acid formed by bacteria in the mouth by preventing these acids from removing essential minerals from the tooth surface. Fluoride also helps to repair damaged tooth enamel.

What is dental fluorosis?

Dental fluorosis is a change in the appearance of the tooth's enamel attributed to exposure to too much fluoride. According to the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), over 90% of fluorosis observed in the United States is mild to very mild in severity and is observed as white spots or streaks on the tooth surface. Dental fluorosis can occur when children regularly consume higher-than-recommended amounts of fluoride during the teeth-forming years (age 8 and younger). Individuals on private well water supplies that contain excessive amounts of fluoride may develop moderate to severe forms of dental fluorosis, including more extensive enamel changes. In very unusual instances, pits may form in the teeth. Severe cases of dental fluorosis rarely occur in communities where the level of fluoride in water is less than 2 milligrams per liter.

How can I ensure that my child is getting enough fluoride to prevent cavities while avoiding dental fluorosis?

According to the US CDC, if your community water supply is optimally fluoridating at 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter and you are following recommended guidelines with respect to your child's tooth brushing habits, it is highly unlikely that your child is being exposed to too much fluoride. The CDC recommends that children under the age of six who are using fluoride toothpaste should use a small, pea-sized amount on the brush, spit out the excess paste, and rinse well after brushing. It is recommended that use of fluoride-containing toothpaste begin when your child is two years old. Fluoride-containing toothpaste should only be used with children under the age of two if recommended by your child's doctor or dentist. The correct use of fluoride treatments and fluoride-containing toothpaste can be discussed with your child's dentist. In addition, the CDC's website offers guidance on how young children can use fluoride-containing products to prevent dental fluorosis. See Brush Up on Healthy Teeth.

The US Department of Health and Human Services recently made the recommendation that the optimal range of water fluoridation of 0.7 to 1.2 ppm (parts per million) be changed to an optimal dose of 0.7 ppm due to observations of increasing amounts of fluoride in food that is processed with fluoridated drinking water. This recommendation is still being finalized, but some US states have adopted this optimal dose for fluoridation of community water supplies. You can check with your local water supplier to see how much fluoride is in your drinking water. Consumers served by private wells may choose to have their water tested by a state certified laboratory. You can find a laboratory by contacting your state water certification officer.

Are the chemicals used for water fluoridation safe, I heard they are made from fertilizer?

Phosphate containing rocks and minerals are reacted with sulfuric acid to produce phosphate which is used in a wide variety of products from soft drinks and other foods, to cleaning products and, yes, even fertilizer. Hydrofluosilicic acid is a by-product of this phosphate manufacturing process. It can be used for fluoridation of drinking water or may be further processed to form solid sodium fluoride or sodium fluorosilicate. All three of these chemicals can be used for treatment of drinking water. However, drinking water treatment chemicals are required by most US states and Canadian provinces to be tested and certified to NSF/ANSI Standard 60: Drinking Water Treatment Chemical - Health Effects. This standard establishes criteria for the evaluation of treatment chemicals to ensure that they, and any potential contaminants, do not cause adverse health effects when they are dosed into drinking water at the manufacturer's stated maximum use level. 

Comments

  1. David McRae David McRae Australia says:

    I dont think the comments on dental fluorosis are correct. The CDC has published figures showing that very high proportion of children have some degree of D Fluorosis, including the more severe kinds. If only well waters could cause fluoride overload then you could not have 40% of children suffering this tooth damage.
    The problem arises from the multiple sources of exposure. Some children swallow some of their toothpaste. On its own that may be OK, but when every mouthful of water that child swallows, in drinks or cooking, also contains chemical fluoride, then the child is a sitting duck for fluoride overload. It is not a good situation.
    In fact, it is a medical / health treatment without the consent of the child's family.

  2. John Murphy John Murphy United States says:

    Once it's in the water it gets in everything. Wine, juice, beer, soda, vegetables, grains, etc. Here's a list from the USDA. Most of the world has stopped fluoridating. Only about 70 percent of the United States is still being poisoned by the fluoride in the water.

    All sides agree to the fact that healthy kidneys can eliminate only about 50% of daily fluoride intake. The rest gets absorbed in calcified tissues, like bones and teeth. The National Academy Of Sciences (NAS) stated in 1977 that, for the average individual, a retention of 2mg/day would result in crippling skeletal fluorosis after 40 years.

    Dr. Arvid Caarlson, 2000 Nobel prize in medicine winner says, "In Sweden, water fluoridation, to my knowledge, is no longer advocated by anybody. In Sweden, the emphasis nowadays is to keep the environment as clean as possible with regard to pharmacologically active and, thus, potentially toxic substances."

    "I am opposed to fluoridation because of the overwhelming evidence that fluoridation is not only potentially harmful but has already caused considerable, well-documented harm." Albert Schatz, Ph.D., biochemistry, world-renowned discoverer of streptomycin (Oct., 1999).

    Poison should not be added to the water and I shouldn't have to pay thousands for a reverse osmosis filter to take it out of my water. I don't want to water my garden with it or bathe in it either.

    from the USDA www.ars.usda.gov/.../F02.pdf.

    Only a small margin separates supposedly beneficial fluoride levels from amounts that are known to cause adverse effects. Dr. James Patrick, a former antibiotics research scientist at the National Institutes of Health, describes the predicament: "[There is] a very low margin of safety involved in fluoridating water. A concentration of about 1 ppm is recommended...in several countries, severe fluorosis has been documented from water supplies containing only 2 or 3 ppm. In the development of drugs...we generally insist on a therapeutic index (margin of safety) of the order of 100; a therapeutic index of 2 or 3 is totally unacceptable, yet that is what has been proposed for public water supplies..."

    There is plenty of fluoride in food and toothpaste without putting industrial waste in the water.

  3. James Reeves James Reeves United States says:

    The public water supply should never have been used to deliver a drug. Once added to the water you cannot control the dose, you cannot control who gets the medicine, no doctor is checking side effects such as  individual susceptibly, it is taken for life in every glass of water and it violates individual’s right to informed consent.

    Medical professionals should be ashamed to support such a crude and unethical practice which results in cancer, thyroid & pineal gland damage, broken hips from brittle bones, lowered IQ, kidney disease,  arthritis and other serious health problems.

  4. Brian Cassells Brian Cassells Australia says:

    Fluoride in our tap water is a toxic waste from the fertilizer and the aluminium  industries it is not natural fluoride, to make matters worst it is imported from china. Google infants and fluoride, to get the truth about this poison, most of our ills are caused by fluoride, if fluoride is so good for our teeth,why is there a waiting list of 160,000 people in NSW needing treatment, also I am 73 years old, I have been medicated since 1960, I wear dentures, as do most older medicated citizens, I THINK A CLASS ACTION is overdue against those responsible, the only ones who benefit are the BIG PHARMA, AND DENTISTS. GUMMY NSW

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Antiseizure medications during pregnancy linked to neurodevelopmental risks in children