Study explores how different groups interact with media messages about e-cigarettes

Adults are widely exposed to e-cigarette marketing through the media, but those messages reach different demographic groups in different ways, according to a survey by researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago's Institute for Health Research and Policy.

The study is published as a special supplement in the July 2014 issue of Tobacco Control.

Eighty-six percent of those surveyed were aware of e-cigarettes, and 47 percent had seen or heard about them on television, on the radio, in print media or online. The survey of 17,522 adults was conducted online last year.

"These are significant findings, given how recently these products have entered the market and the fact that less than 20 percent of the U.S. population was aware of them five years ago," the study authors report.

Television was the most common medium for encountering e-cigs -- two-thirds of people said they saw them on TV. Internet banner ads (14 percent), email (13 percent), Internet search engines (11 percent) and Facebook (9 percent) were other ways people encountered e-cigarette information.

Passive exposure to e-cig messaging -- receiving information without seeking it -- was more likely for tobacco users, young adults, males, those with more than a high school education, and those who use social media and spend more time online.

"These findings may have implications for e-cigarette marketing regulation," said Sherry Emery, a senior scientist at the UIC institute and lead author of the study.

Although people did report sharing information about e-cigs via Facebook, texting, email and Twitter, word-of-mouth exchange was most common, at 54 percent.

The researchers uncovered important demographic differences in how people search and share e-cigarette information online.

Tobacco users were five times as likely as non-users to report sharing information about e-cigarettes. Young adults were nearly twice as likely as other respondents to have shared e-cigarette information.

E-cigarette users were more likely than nonusers to search for e-cig information on Facebook, and more likely than nonusers to share such information by word of mouth and on Facebook.

The study also found that Latinos and Lesbian, gay or bisexual individuals were more likely than others to share e-cig information.

The study is the first to explore how different groups interact with media messages about e-cigarettes, and it shows that social networking is a critical component of both formal and informal e-cig marketing.

"While we cannot tell from this cross-sectional work whether the differences in e-cig media consumption reflect targeted marketing, self-selection, or a combination of the two, this work suggests that closer scrutiny of e-cig marketing practices is warranted," said Emery.

Comments

  1. Mickelodian Ranks Mickelodian Ranks Ireland says:

    Sorry I'm lost... since theres no harm identified from ecigs in the past 10 years (which is long term...in fact twice as long as would be required) since they were first sold... and since there are no patients in any hospitals complaining of ecig induced diseases. Since in all that time anyone with an axe to grind has thrown literally billions of dollars desperately trying to find problems with vaporisers including putting voltages of 100 or 200 volts through them (the normal voltage is just 5 volts)  and then claiming they produced toxins at that voltage (what a surprise)  ... in all that time, with all of those studies nobody has identified a single thing that poses a public health risk... nothing whatsoever.... not so much as a molecule out of place...

    At this point its truly pathetic looking at folks making fools of themselves... nobody is falling for it any more. If anything its like looking at idiots claiming they invented the perpetual motion machine.

    Anyway rant over.... the above being the case then what does it matter if there were 17 thousand tweets trying to either sell them (or more likely simply running a scam to get money) from folks? Thats whos's sending out the tweets BTW...scam artists who are not selling ecigs... they are just looking for your credit card number.

    I'd hazard a guess in the same period there were several million commercial tweets trying to sell class A drugs (again more scams) and probably a billion tweets or more selling all sorts of other stuff...

    This is pointless science....and to me demonstrates that often times research money is spent fruitlessly. This is a reason to question the motives of the researchers...

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Garlic’s antioxidant and nitric oxide boosting effects may help lower blood pressure