Study highlights potential benefit of follow-up screening for woman with early breast cancer

Public health researchers from the University of Adelaide have evaluated international breast cancer guidelines, finding that there is potential to improve surveillance of breast cancer survivors from both a patient and health system perspective.

International guidelines recommend annual follow-up mammograms for every woman after treatment for early breast cancer, regardless of the risk of her cancer returning. There is also no strong evidence to support annual mammography compared with other possible mammography schedules.

In a paper published in the journal Value in Health, researchers in the University's School of Population Health demonstrate that for postmenopausal women with moderate prognosis early breast cancer, less frequent surveillance may be more cost-effective, especially for those older than 70 years.

"Due to early diagnosis and improved treatment, the number of breast cancer survivors is increasing. All of these women will need follow-up mammography to detect recurrent or new disease," says the study's co-author, Professor Jon Karnon.

"But while the diagnosis and treatment have significantly improved the outlook for many cancer patients, approaches to cancer surveillance haven't changed.

"The results show that for younger postmenopausal women at moderate risk of breast cancer recurrence, annual follow-up screening for five years, with two yearly visits thereafter, appears to be cost-effective.

"For older women, a mammography schedule every two years is likely to be cost-effective, if women continue to attend follow-up mammography," he says.

The researchers based their findings on health service data and simulation modelling, enabling them to predict the long-term costs and health outcomes of alternative mammography schedules for women, based on the women's age and the features of their primary breast cancer.

"It's clear to us that the current 'one size fits all' international guideline of annual follow-up mammography may not be necessary for all women with early breast cancer," says study co-author Clinical Associate Professor Taryn Bessen.

"This work highlights the potential benefit of tailoring follow-up to the risk of recurrence, and the use of modelling methods to help guide clinical practice in an evidence-based and pragmatic manner."

Comments

  1. Jarret Jones Jarret Jones United States says:

    Little to none good evidence is available in support of regular mammography, at any age bracket, but the completeness of mammogram data show the test does more serious damage than serious benefit to most women, at any age  (see: Rolf Hefti's "The Mammogram Myth"- more at TheMammogramMyth dot com and "Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy" by Peter Gotzsche).

    The general public only knows the official corporate-crafted (=biased) "scientific" version of pro-mammography, data generated mostly by people with vested interests tied to the mammography business.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Assessing the impact of gozetotide in PSMA-positive prostate cancer