Expert panel develops first-ever guideline to treat tooth decay in primary and permanent teeth

A new American Dental Association (ADA) clinical practice guideline suggests conservative methods to treat tooth decay in primary and permanent teeth could lead to better outcomes when used with common restorative materials like fillings or caps. An expert panel of dentists developed the first-ever guideline on this topic after extensive review of approximately 300 published studies.

The guideline, published in the July issue of The Journal of the American Dental Association, contains 16 recommendations regarding treatment of moderate and advanced tooth decay in primary and permanent teeth that have not received endodontic treatment, such as a root canal. It indicates conservative carious tissue removal (CTR) – in which a dentist removes infected tissue while preserving as much of the original tooth structure as possible – is less likely to result in adverse outcomes like nerve exposure or a failed filling.

The recommendations also identify selective CTR as an effective treatment option in most cases of moderate or advanced decay in primary and permanent teeth. This method involves removing most, but not all, of the decayed tissue before sealing the tooth with a filling or cap. The bacteria left behind under the new filling or cap no longer has what it needs to multiply, which stops tooth decay.

Additionally, the guideline affirms the efficacy of the most common restorative materials for treating moderate or advanced tooth decay, such as tooth-colored fillings, silver-colored fillings (amalgam) or preformed caps in children. It suggests specific materials for primary and permanent teeth depending on the extent of the decay.

Lead author Vineet Dhar, B.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D., is clinical professor and chair of orthodontics and pediatric dentistry at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry and a member of the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. He said the recommendation encapsulates restorative dentistry's two main objectives: maintaining healthy tooth structure and protecting the soft tissue inside the tooth.

While research had already confirmed that selectively removing decayed tissue is an effective approach to treating early tooth decay, dentists needed an evidence-based guideline to provide them with a range of treatment choices for patients with moderate to advanced tooth decay. These recommendations can now inform restorative care strategies in the U.S. and on a global level."

Vineet Dhar, B.D.S., M.D.S., Ph.D., clinical professor and chair of orthodontics and pediatric dentistry at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry

This is the ADA's second clinical practice guideline in a series on caries treatment. The new guideline was developed by the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and the Clinical and Translation Research team within the ADA Science and Research Institute, which convened a panel of experts to review the best-available scientific evidence around treatments and materials. The new restoration guideline and existing recommendations on non-restorative treatment for tooth decay can be found at ada.org/cariesguidelines.

Source:
Journal reference:

Dhar, V., et al. (2023) Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on restorative treatments for caries lesions. The Journal of the American Dental Association. doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2023.04.011.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Research suggests no need for yellow fever vaccine booster after initial dose