Larger lymph node threshold helps facilitate better risk stratification and treatment decisions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

According to the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), using a 6-mm threshold, rather than a 5-mm threshold, helps facilitate better risk stratification and treatment decisions in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Future American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging updates should consider incorporation of the 6-mm threshold for N-category and tumor-stage determinations."

Zhiying Liang, MD, corresponding author from the radiology department at China's Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

This AJR accepted manuscript by Liang et al. included 1,752 patients (median age, 46 years; 1,297 men, 455 women) with NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy from January 2010 to March 2014 from two hospitals; 438 patients underwent MRI 3-4 months after treatment. Two radiologists measured the minimal axial diameter (MAD) of the largest retropharyngeal lymph node (RLN) for each patient via consensus. Then, to assess interobserver agreement, a third radiologist measured MAD in 260 randomly selected patients. Initial ROC and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to derive an optimal MAD threshold for predicting progression-free survival (PFS).

Ultimately, in patients with NPC, overall survival was significantly different between patients with stage-I and stage-II disease defined using a 6-mm threshold (p = .04)-;but not using a 5-mm threshold (p = .09). The 5-year PFS rate was associated with post-radiotherapy MAD ≥ 6 mm (HR = 1.68, p = .04) but not with post-radiotherapy MAD ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.09, p = .71).

"Given the absence of a defined size threshold in the AJCC 8th edition staging manual," the AJR authors noted, "we propose that future updates to the manual incorporate this threshold for N-category and tumor-stage determinations."

Source:
Journal reference:

Zhu, Y., et al. (2023) Optimal Size Threshold for MRI-Detected Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes to Predict Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Two-Center Study. American Journal of Roentgenology. doi.org/10.2214/AJR.23.29984.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New discovery offers hope for treating aggressive adenoid cystic carcinoma