Study shows AI can predict prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer

Researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden have investigated how well different AI models can predict the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer by analyzing certain immune cells inside the tumor. The study, published in the journal eClinicalMedicine, is an important step towards using AI in cancer care to improve patient health.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are a type of immune cell that plays an important role in fighting cancer. When they are present in a tumor, it means that the immune system is trying to attack and destroy the cancer cells.

These immune cells can be important in predicting how a patient with so-called triple-negative breast cancer will respond to treatment and how the disease will progress. But when pathologists assess the immune cells, the results can vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) can help standardise and automate this process, but it has been difficult to demonstrate that AI works well enough to be used in healthcare.

Compared ten AI models

The researchers tested ten different AI models and compared their ability to analyze tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer tissue samples.

The results showed that the AI models varied in their analytical performance. Despite these differences, eight of the ten models showed good prognostic ability, meaning they were able to predict patients' future health in a similar way.

Even models trained on fewer samples showed good prognostic ability, suggesting that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are a robust biomarker."

Balazs Acs, researcher at the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet

Independent studies needed

The study shows that large datasets are needed to compare different AI tools and ensure that they work well before they can be used in healthcare. While the results are promising, more validation is needed.

"Our research highlights the importance of independent studies that mimic real clinical practice," says Balazs Acs. "Only through such testing can we ensure that AI tools are reliable and effective for clinical use."

Source:
Journal reference:

Vidal, J. M., et al. (2024). The analytical and clinical validity of AI algorithms to score TILs in TNBC: can we use different machine learning models interchangeably? eClinicalMedicine. doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102928.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Scientists discover key genetic factors behind testicular cancer