Essential oils have been found to kill the deadly MRSA bacteria

Rose Oil is also highly effective of treating dermatitis and other skin related problems. The researches has been done on treatment of leprosy using rose oil.

OK, aren't you going to tell us which oils?

Well? Which oils are used?

What are the Essential Oils used on the MRSA and others?

Of course they won't tell you what oils. They are trying to patent these 3 oils so they can charge more for them. Lemongrass, Tea Tree, & Oregano have worked for me as well as adding Clove Bud, Cinnamon Bark and Frankincense.

I will take a bath in these oils daily if I need to ... just tell us how to use them most effectively...

10 % Benzoyl Peroxide soap will work topically for staph folliculitis. Also Coconut oil applied in the morning and night.

My friend treated her MRSA infection using essential oils both internally (which almost every professional aromatherapist in the US recommends against but which can be effective when done with guidance) and topical application (bottom of feet every two hours) using a combination of onguard (combination of clove, wild orange and few other essential oils from an oil company), oregano, frankincense, peppermint and lemon. She took the protocol from a book called Modern Essentials.

I would think that diffusing the oils would be best, since it mentions that MSRA enters through the nose (at least that's what I recall the article saying).  I know the brand of EO's that I sell has a blend I would use if I was in the hospital.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15555788

The researchers from the article aren't interested in helping society, they're in it for themselves and want to make money off of the products. Who cares if thousands of people die from MRSA while they try and figure out a way to produce a sellable product. Sounds like they will all make great CEO's of their new company.

This type of article just makes me angry!!  Give us ALL the info will ya??
Here are a couple HELPFUL articles.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3346404/

I was wondering if you could please provide a reference to the cited study, as I would be interested in reading it.. I have searched the internet for any other references and have found none..

How was the research conducted? Was it in vitro or in Vivo? What was the sample size? Did it reach statistical significance? Great if it's true but doesn't appear to be enough info to back up claim.

Here's the key 'We are having problems finding this funding because essential oils cannot be patented as they are naturally occurring, so few drug companies are interested in our work as they do not see it as commercially viable."
Interpretation: When we get a formula put together, patent it and perform unnecessary already proven clinical results then have to again perform successful multiple double blind studies that we never needed so we can show that we deserve to reap in billions of dollars by helping people recover from this infection. Barf

It saddens me a little that the perception out there from so many commenters is that they won't tell you which oils used because the are trying to make a billion.  While I agree that is likely the case for many out there, I also know that the FDA and other organizations like it have made it difficult for experts and laypeople to make any sort of claims regarding essential oils.  I wonder if they didn't reveal which oils they used because they are trying to keep from crossing the "compliancy" line.  Or maybe they really are looking to find a way to somehow make some money off of it.  I know this - one of the reasons essential oils are considered so taboo these days - when they used to be the ONLY option since the beginning of time - is that they can't be patented.  So as such, no one can really make any money off of them in that sense and therefore like they said in the article, no one will fund the research that proves their effectiveness.  As for me, I don't need the "official" research.  I have seen and felt what they have done for me and my family.  But it saddens me that despite proof and history, these sorts of findings are not more widely accepted and the overall benefit to mankind is not the focus for some.  The funding is out there...I just believe it's just spent on things that can make those providing the funding some additional money.  God bless those people involved on "both sides" of this topic.

The reason they will not state which oils is that because of FDA restrictions, they are NOT ALLOWED TO.  The key is what they said in the article, they can't find funding because the oils cannot be patented since they are naturally occurring compounds.  I'm a distributor for Young Living oils, and many oils have been found to have these properties, however, if we tell you what they are we can be shut down - even the entire company can be shut down.  They have threatened Young Living with complete shut down unless all distributors comply with not making any claims as to what specific oils can do until a battery of tests is run by people the FDA approves of (nevermind that they are mostly big pharma companies who will not do these studies because, again, they can't make money from something they can't patent).  There are people dying daily who could probably be saved if only the FDA did not have a strangle-hold on the process.  Meanwhile, they approve drugs (and even require certain drugs) that are known to cause cancer, cause major neurological and other problems, and even kill you.  Because those, my friends, make money.  The western medicine system is too caught up in the dollar to be willing to admit or reveal that the human body is interconnected and what impacts one part will impact all.  Drugs go into your bloodstream, therefore, your whole body is being effected when you introduce anything into your bloodstream.  I am ALL FOR people making money, but not at the expense of someone else being sick or dying because something that would end that suffering isn't profitable enough to do what is needed to get it to the public.  The FDA is the biggest problem, here, because it's pockets are interconnected with big pharma and they are both helping each other not let us know what will heal us.

I had MRSA a year ago and almost died.  Please tell me just WHICH oils purchase because it is still in my bloodstream.

I contacted this deadly virus back in 96, before they gave it a name.   I spent 7 long hears battling to stay alive because of it.  On 3 separate occasions I did make that transition to the other side. But I always came back...  If this doesn't become mainstream news you can bet your bottom dollar that Giant Pharma has grown kind of fond of the virus.

This is wonderful to see that science is acknowledging this. We have been aware of this for many years. Tea Tree is one that has been used and confirmed.

I am very pleased to read that they can not patent this and nor should they be able to!

It should be illegal to hold back these information from the public. Lets start kicking their asses untill the release this knowledge in details. Stop buying their patented shit and demand new regulations that force them to share all their knowledge and go open source.