To live longer - eat less!

Scientists have known for a long time that animals fed diets which border on starvation live longer, but they are now saying that a particular gene is linked to calorie restriction.

In the 1930's it was found that laboratory animals fed a calorie-restricted diet lived longer and had a lower risk of cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but until now, there has been little evidence to suggest that calorie restriction diets extended human lives.

Researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, have identified a gene in roundworms that directly links calorie restriction to a longer lifespan.

The research team led by Andrew Dillin say a gene called pha-4 plays a role in gut development in embryonic worms, but in adults is associated with calorie-restricted longevity.

However Mr Dillin also says it is unclear whether similar genes may play a similar role in humans but humans do have three genes very similar to the worm's pha-4.

These genes say the researchers are related to glucagon, a pancreatic hormone that increases blood sugar concentration and maintains the body's energy balance, particularly during fasting.

The researchers say the pinpointing of the worm gene might lead to drugs being developed that imitate the effects of calorie restriction and could allow people to live longer without following a severely restrictive diet.

Mr Dillin says whether dietary restriction will increase longevity in humans is unclear but they are now testing the diets on monkeys.

As Mr Dillin says some people are actively doing this voluntarily; he says it usually takes a 50 to 70 per cent reduction in normal food intake to yield longer lifespan in animals but if food is reduced too much and leaning towards starvation that would make life shorter.

Dietary restriction says Mr Dillon is one of the universal forms of increasing longevity and this has been shown in everything ranging from yeast all the way up to dogs.

The report is published in the current issue of the journal Nature.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Overtreatment of older men with prostate cancer raises concerns