Governments need to take more leadership on global mercury debate: Delegates

Delegates from more than 120 countries met this week to continue constructing a legally-binding global mercury treaty, expected to be signed in Minamata, Japan in 2013.  While many important issues were discussed, public interest NGOs urged delegates to be more ambitious when setting the mercury treaty's scope and goals.  

"Governments need to step up and take more leadership in this debate," stated Linda E. Greer, Ph.D., of the Natural Resources Defense Council and Zero Mercury Working Group. "Mercury is a problem within our grasp to solve, but it will take political will and focus to resolve it."

The Minamata tragedy provided a centerpiece and inspiration for discussion.  

Minamata victim Shinobu Sakamoto testified in the plenary session and presented a statement from 13 Minamata victims and supporter groups directly to the Vice Minister of the Japanese Ministry of Environment.  They urged delegates to develop a strong treaty that would prevent future Minamata catastrophes, and to justly address the continuing effects of the Minamata disaster, still unresolved after over 50 years.

The Japanese government also received criticism from NGOs for its continued export of tons of toxic mercury, especially to developing countries.  

"Japan knows more than any country in the world the terrible cost to life and the environment that mercury causes because of Minamata," stated Richard Gutierrez, of Ban Toxics from the Philippines.  "Only a ban of Japanese mercury export can begin to give honor to Minamata's legacy."

Measures to reduce the global supply of commodity mercury, to reduce mercury use in industry and to restrict trade were debated.  Delegates also discussed requirements to control mercury emissions from major sources such as coal fired power plants and metal smelters and to address existing contaminated sites. Although delegates generally agreed that the proposed basic framework for the reductions of mercury pollution was adequate, many substantive issues remain to be resolved to ensure that health and environmental resources are protected worldwide.

NGOs spoke out on many occasions during the session, with recommendations for strengthening provisions, including:  expanding the list of mercury-based products and processes to be regulated under the treaty, providing explicit time lines for phase outs, and strengthening provisions that address artisanal and small-scale gold mining, the largest single use of mercury in the world, among many others.  

Several manufacturing processes using mercury completely escaped notice in the working draft, such as polyurethanes and sodium methylate.  "Since there are well-developed, high-volume non-mercury alternatives available to produce these materials, the mercury-based processes should be phased out," said Rachel Kamande of the European Environmental Bureau and ZMWG.  

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.