Examining alternatives to assessing Global Fund effectiveness

In this post in the Center for Global Development's "Global Health Policy" blog, William Savedoff, a senior fellow at the center, responds to a high level panel's assessment (.pdf) of fiduciary controls at the Global Fund to Fight, AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, examining "what this report might mean for an organization that was expressly created to blaze an innovative approach to international aid and is being counseled to back away from that vision." He writes that another approach to assessing the Global Fund "would measure the organization's effectiveness by progress in combating disease rather than the rate of disbursement and the accurate accounting of funds" (9/22).


    http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

    Comments

    The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
    Post a new comment
    Post

    While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

    Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

    Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

    Read the full Terms & Conditions.

    You might also like...
    Drinking non-fermented milk may increase the risk of heart disease in women