Software by Riverain
Technologies significantly improves radiologists' ability to detect
potentially cancerous lung nodules in X-ray images, and might be a
cost-effective alternative to dual energy subtraction (DES) imaging,
according to two new studies being presented at the 20th
Anniversary Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI),
June 22-24, in London.
Riverain's ClearRead Bone Suppression™ software uses machine learning
algorithms to transform any conventional chest X-ray image into an
enhanced, soft tissue image without the ribs and clavicles that
sometimes obscure early lung
cancer. DES also creates a soft tissue image but requires a
dedicated dual energy imaging machine to form it. Depending on the
methodology, DES may require two separate scans, thus exposing patients
to more radiation than conventional X-ray. Riverain's computer-aided
detection (CAD) software, ClearRead +Detect™, provides further support
in decision making by circling suspicious areas on a bone-suppressed
image that may be lung cancer. Final determination is made by the
radiologist.
Riverain's Bone Suppression Technology is Comparable to DES
The first study, conducted at the Institute of Diagnostic,
Interventional and Pediatric Radiology at the University Hospital Bern,
Switzerland, compared Riverain's bone suppression and DES alone and in
combination with CAD and found that Riverain's bone suppression software
is as good as DES at detecting lung nodules while producing superior
image quality.
In the retrospective study, three radiologists independently reviewed
chest images of 143 patients: 101 patients with 155 lung nodules between
5-29mm previously confirmed using CT, and 42 subjects with no lung
nodules. Each radiologist marked suspected nodules on each patient's
original chest X-ray image, and individually on DES and bone-suppressed
images with and without CAD.
The radiologists detected the most lung nodules in the bone-suppressed
image with CAD markings. Their mean sensitivities - the percentage of
the 155 lung nodules that were accurately identified - were: 46.9
percent using conventional X-ray only; 49.2 percent using a single-shot
DES system; 49.7 percent using SoftView 2.0 (an earlier version of
Riverain's ClearRead Bone Suppression); and 51.6 percent using SoftView
2.0 plus OnGuard 5.1 (an earlier version Riverain's ClearRead +Detect
software). The overall diagnostic performance with the modalities was
not significantly different.
"These findings are compelling results for hospitals, radiology
practices and patients," said Steve Worrell, Riverain's Chief Technology
Officer. "Radiologists detected as many lung nodules using Riverain bone
suppression software on conventional X-ray images as they detected using
a dedicated piece of imaging equipment that is more expensive, may
expose patients to more radiation, and can only be used in the single
location where it is housed. Our software immediately enhances any
standard chest X-ray image, after capture, and can be used throughout
entire healthcare systems without additional imaging equipment, staff or
space requirements, and without any additional tests or radiation dose
for patients."
The radiologists also gave the bone-suppressed images a significantly
higher overall quality rating than the DES images. The true positive and
false positive rates of these two modalities were statistically
equivalent.
"Electronic bone suppression provides equivalent detection rates for
lung nodules as DES, with better image quality, and might be a
cost-effective alternative to DES chest radiography in the detection of
lung nodules," said Zsolt Szucs-Farkas, M.D., Ph.D., chief investigator.
CAD and Radiologists Have Complementary Strengths
Dr. Szucs-Farkas also compared CAD markings before radiologist
interpretation to the radiologists' findings. While CAD and the
radiologists detected many of the same lung nodules, each also detected
nodules the other did not find. CAD, on its own without any radiologist
interpretation (assessed for research purposes only), accurately circled
approximately 1 in 4 nodules that the radiologists missed, and the
radiologists found approximately 1 in 3 nodules that CAD missed.
"Working together, radiologists and our CAD with bone suppression
software bring different strengths to the table and significantly
improve the detection of nodules that may be lung cancer using
conventional chest X-ray," Worrell said.
Worldwide, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men and
the second leading cause of cancer death in women.
Another Study Confirms Benefits of Riverain Bone Suppression
Technology
A second study to be presented at ESTI 2012 again confirms Riverain's
bone suppression software significantly improves radiologists' ability
to detect lung nodules in chest X-ray images. Eight radiologists at
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) and the Meander
Medical Centre in Amersfoort, the Netherlands, reviewed chest X-ray
images for 108 patients with a solitary CT-proven lung nodule and 192
patients without nodules. On average, they found 14.4 percent of lung
nodules using Riverain's bone suppression technology (SoftView 2.4, now
called ClearRead Bone Suppression) that were missed when they used
conventional X-ray alone, without an increase in false positives. All
individual readers improved detection with the help of the bone
suppression software. Individual reader results ranged from as low as 52
percent without bone suppression to a high of 81 percent with the
software. Average detection overall was 67 percent using X-ray alone,
and 72 percent with bone suppression software.
"Multiple studies have shown that Riverain's bone suppression technology
works for lung nodule detection," said researcher Steven Schalekamp,
M.D., a Ph.D. student in the Department of Radiology of RUNMC.
Schalekamp conducted the research under the supervision of Cornelia
Schaefer-Prokop, M.D., Ph.D., a radiologist at Meander Medical Center,
Amersfoort, the Netherlands. Dr. Schaefer-Prokop is a member of
Riverain's medical advisory board.