Zimbabwean lawmakers take public HIV tests in campaign to fight stigma

"Zimbabwean lawmakers started taking public HIV tests on Wednesday in a campaign seeking to raise awareness and fight the stigma associated with AIDS," VOA News reports, adding, "At least 60 parliamentarians from across the political divide will have tested when the three-day program, which is also offering counseling services, ends Friday." According to the news service, "The Zimbabwe Parliamentarians Against HIV/AIDS, a voluntary organization formed early this year to promote awareness and fight stigma in communities, is leading the campaign" (Gumbo/Gonda, 6/21).

Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe "recently said that revealing HIV status will help stop the spread of the pandemic and fight the stigma associated with the virus that causes AIDS," the news service writes in a separate article. "Speaker of Parliament Lovemore Moyo was among MPs who were tested for HIV," VOA notes, adding, "He said parliament took Mugabe's calls seriously, [and] expects other branches of the government to do the same." The news service notes, "Some male parliament members will be circumcised Friday" (Mhofu, 6/21).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

  1. Hugh7 Hugh7 New Zealand says:

    In Zimbabwe in 2005, USAID found 14.2% of non-circumcised men had HIV compared to 16.6% of circumcised men. (Similar differences apply in 10 of 18 countries for which it has figures.) Shouldn't this at least be explained before blundering on with mass circumcision programmes? The "up to 60% reduction" figure amounts to a total of 73 circumcised men who did not get HIV less than two years after 5,400 men were circumcised, while 64 did (and 327 dropped out, their HIV status unknown). Circumcision does nothing to directly protect women, who are at greater risk, and may even INcrease the risk to them. It will make it harder for women to insist that men use condoms. It is a recipe for disaster.

    Zimbabwe has horrendous health problems. The money and resources being spent cutting men's genitals could be used much more effectively on measures that would, for example, keep children alive long enough to be at risk of sexually transmitted HIV. THEN is the time to worry about that.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Georgetown University receives $27.5 million grant to combat HIV/AIDS in Haiti