Women with vaginal prolapse are most likely to benefit from vaginal mesh surgery

Certain women with vaginal prolapse are most likely to benefit from undergoing vaginal mesh surgery, a technique that has become controversial and is the focus of numerous lawsuits. The findings, which are published early online in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, provide valuable information regarding who should and should not be considered candidates for the surgery.

Vaginal prolapse-when pelvic tissues weaken and the vaginal canal may protrude through the vaginal opening-affects roughly 10% to 20% of women. A significant number of patients require repeat surgeries to correct this recurring issue. They often undergo sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy-which involves attaching the vagina to surrounding tissue in the abdomen to hold it in place-or a surgical procedure that inserts a net-like implant called a vaginal mesh.

While studies suggest that vaginal mesh may reduce recurrence rates, it also has been linked with significant complications. (Indeed, vaginal mesh is the focus of a number of ongoing lawsuits.) To justify the potential complications associated with mesh use, it's important to identify women at high risk of prolapse recurrence.

Research suggests that a condition called levator avulsion is a major contributor to the development of pelvic floor prolapse and to its recurrence after surgery. This condition occurs when a woman suffers from an injury to the pelvic floor muscle during vaginal childbirth.

This information led Kamil Svab-k, MD, PhD, of Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, and his colleagues to compare sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy with vaginal mesh in patients with post-hysterectomy prolapse and levator avulsion, as diagnosed by ultrasound imaging.

The randomized clinical trial included 70 women: 36 underwent vaginal mesh surgery and 34 underwent sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy. At the one-year follow-up, ultrasound examinations revealed that there was one recurrence in the vaginal mesh group (2.8%), and 21 recurrences in the sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy group (61.8%). Dr. Svab-k noted that despite the study's small size, the team was able to achieve significant results.

"By assessing patients prior to receiving treatment using pelvic floor ultrasound imaging, we are able to identify women who will benefit from vaginal mesh implantation over a conventional approach and dramatically reduce the risk of repeat surgery," said Dr. Svab-k. "This is a win/win situation for our patients and for understanding the reasons behind varying success rates of conventional or less traditional treatments."

Source:

Comments

  1. Sherrie Palm Sherrie Palm United States says:

    As a transvaginal mesh success story and a pelvic organ prolapse advocate, it's been quite an uphill struggle to soften women's fears about mesh and enlighten them about the fact that mesh is a significant, valuable tool in a fellowship trained practitioner's toolbox. To date the media has not bothered to share the fact that without mesh, women are typically back on the table for more surgery in 1-5 years because tissues can not sustain the repairs. I've encouraged the media to share a balanced piece on the value of mesh when utilized by specialists and the dangers of mesh in non-specialists hands but negative energy typically grabs better so is typically the direction pursued. Thank you for sharing this valuable piece; I'll share it with our following in the very near future!

    Sherrie Palm Founder/Executive Director
    Association for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Support

  2. Noreen Wideman Noreen Wideman Canada says:

    What tests do these doctors do to see which patients will have biocompatible body types to synthetic mesh ...approx 30% will have chronic inflammation contributing to implant failure ,  (mesh degradation, migration, fragmentation, erosions and extrusions) which contibutes to more inflammation that initiates autoimmune systemic responses .... until tests can be found to protect patients synthetic  mesh implantation should be considered a last high risk resort.......

  3. caro evens caro evens New Zealand says:

    Medical mesh for prolapse is not okay because a bunch of scientists say it is this stuff ruins womens lives women are not a scientific experience oh and the little side effects mesh that do not seem to rate a mention here are No sex for life, pain, erosion, loss of job, losing your home due to no income,  pain,pain and more pain, loss of husband due to no sex, inability function as a mum or parent, not able to walk, up to 18 surgeries to remove mesh, life long pain, doctors not able to remove mesh even though they can put it in in big quantities, lies from doctors the list goes on do not promote the use of this product to doctors or women it is unethical.

  4. Carmel Berry Carmel Berry New Zealand says:

    I feel very sorry for the 36 unsuspecting women that had the vaginal surgery.  Their implant is a ticking timebomb. Statistically 3 or 4 will experience complications associated specifically with the mesh implant.

    Specifically, the FDA warned that about 1 in 10 women with transvaginal mesh have developed or would develop serious injuries that would necessitate corrective surgery and potentially even extraction of the vaginal mesh sling within one year of implantation. According to the FDA, in the worst cases, multiple revision surgeries were needed to treat the extensive, severe injuries caused by bladder mesh slings.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Researchers uncover why typically normal protein drives prostate cancer