Study detects biomarkers from secondhand marijuana smoke exposure in children

Relaxing with a joint around children is not very wise. Not only do youngsters inhale harmful secondary smoke in the process, but the psychoactive chemicals in the drug are taken up by their bodies as well. This warning comes from Karen Wilson of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the American Academy of Pediatrics Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence in the US. She led the first study showing that it is possible to pick up traces of THC, the primary psychoactive chemical in marijuana, in the urine of children exposed to secondary marijuana smoke. The findings are published in Springer Nature's journal Pediatric Research.

The two primary active components in marijuana are the psychoactive chemical Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and the nonpsychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). Previous analytical methods were mostly developed to measure biomarkers of marijuana in users themselves. In this study, a new and more sensitive analytic method was developed and used by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to quantify the trace biomarkers resulting from secondhand marijuana smoke exposure.

The method was used to analyze the urine samples of 43 babies between the ages of one month and two years who were hospitalized with bronchiolitis in Colorado in the US between 2013 and 2015. Their parents also completed a survey about their marijuana smoking habits. The urine samples were analyzed for traces of marijuana metabolites (measured as levels of COOH-THC) and also for cotinine, a biomarker that indicates exposure to tobacco smoke.

COOH-THC was detectable in 16 percent of the samples, at concentrations between 0.04 and 1.5 nanograms per milliliter of urine. Higher concentrations were found in the urine of non-white children compared with white children.

"While documenting the presence of metabolites of THC in children does not imply causation of disease, it does suggest that, like tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke is inhaled by children in the presence of adults who are using it," says Wilson.

In 56 percent of children with detectable COOH-THC levels, more than 2.0 nanograms of cotinine per milliliter of urine were also measured. This indicates that children exposed to marijuana smoke are also more likely to be exposed to tobacco smoke, which increases their risk for cognitive deficits and respiratory ailments.

According to Wilson, more research is needed to investigate if secondhand marijuana smoke exposure is also a health risk. She believes that further high-sensitivity testing will give researchers the opportunity to do so more effectively, and that funds and human resources should be prioritized for such investigations.

"This research will help inform appropriate educational materials and outreach to parents and caregivers who use both marijuana and tobacco in the presence of their children," she says.

Wilson also supports the inclusion of a parent report screening question for institutions in areas where marijuana is legal, so that those who report household marijuana smoking can be counseled on how to reduce potentially harmful secondhand smoke exposure of their children.

Source:

Comments

  1. Olympic Orangutan Olympic Orangutan United States says:

    Did we seriously need a scientific study to tell us that all second-hand smoke is bad for kids?
    This is just another attempt to cloud what is a very clear issue.

    • Ben James Yokel Ben James Yokel United States says:

      It turns out there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that second-hand cannabis smoke causes problems. In point of fact there's no evidence that first hand cannabis smoke causes problems and in a study done by the Nixon Administration on the Rastafarian culture in Jamaica the following results were obtained. Rosters, who smoke all day have no higher incidence of lung disease or cancer then there non cannabis consuming peers. In point of fact the average Rastafarian lives 3 years longer than the average Jamaican. This may be partially due to their strict vegetarian diet.

  2. Yvonne Forsman Yvonne Forsman United States says:

    Our physical body has receptors for cannabinoids, and even makes a small amount of it and it which is found in the breast milk. It is said that our modern day diseases may be a result of lack of cannabis which has many healing components, not just the psychoactive THC. Jesus used cannabis oil to heal the sick. The US government has cannabis patent, Patent No. 6,630,507. This article is an anti-cannabis propaganda. Wake up, ppl! Don't swallow the MSM constant lies about everything!

  3. John Thomas John Thomas United States says:

    From the article:

    >>>"This indicates that children exposed to marijuana smoke are also more likely to be exposed to tobacco smoke, which increases their risk for cognitive deficits and respiratory ailments."

    lol  -   Second-hand marijuana smoke is dangerous because of.... tobacco smoke?   Give us a break!   Research has shown that not even FIRST-HAND marijuana smoke is harmful to health.   -  Oh, wait a minute.   Then there's this statement from the article:

    >>>"According to Wilson, more research is needed to investigate if secondhand marijuana smoke exposure is also a health risk."

    So they HAVEN"T found second-hand marijuana smoke is harmful.   -  What fascinating NON-INFORMATION.    -  Of course it's not harmful.  In fact, marijuana consumers are increasingly turning to consuming with edibles or vaporization, so NO SMOKE.

    As Ms. Forsman notes,  it could well turn out these minute, trace amounts may be BENEFICIAL to people and children.    Since our body produces its own cannabinoids, it could be like taking vitamins.

    But when they find this out, who believes they are going to make a big deal out of it and put it out on the news wires?  -  Most likely....

    [crickets chirping]

  4. John Thomas John Thomas United States says:

    Just to balance this out with what we DO know...   The country's leading researcher of marijuana and lung disease, UCLA's Dr. Donald Tashkin, conducted investigations over 30 years, initially believing there must be a causal relationship. But he finally concluded that smoking marijuana does NOT cause cancer or ANY other serious disease.

    Tashkin said:  "We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use. What we found instead was no association at all, and even some suggestion of a protective effect."

  5. Ben James Yokel Ben James Yokel United States says:

    There is absolutely not a single shred of scientific peer-reviewed evidence that cannabis smoke causes lung disease or cancer let alone second hand cannabis smoke. Tobacco smoke on the other hand is a well-known carcinogen responsible for over three hundred and ninety thousand deaths per year here in the United States according to the Center for Disease Control. Those really trying to protect children would first want to look into how many children are exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke.

  6. John Thomas John Thomas United States says:

    From the article:  "This indicates that children exposed to marijuana smoke are also more likely to be exposed to tobacco smoke, which increases their risk for cognitive deficits and respiratory ailments."

    So, marijuana is harmful because....  tobacco smoke?   -  LOL  - Give us a break!  -  How desperate to throw dirt on marijuana!

    This study is contrived propaganda.  -  Science has shown even FIRST-HAND marijuana smoke has no significant harms.  --   The country's leading researcher of marijuana and lung disease, UCLA's Dr. Donald Tashkin, conducted investigations over 30 years, initially believing there must be a causal relationship. But he finally concluded that smoking marijuana does NOT cause cancer or ANY other serious disease.

    Tashkin said:  "We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use. What we found instead was no association at all, and even some suggestion of a protective effect."

    As Ms. Forsman has shown, our bodies make our own endocannabinoids, so certainly, with the just the trace elements discussed here, marijuana could turn out to have a beneficial effect - even for children.
      
    But when that's discovered, don't look for it to splashed on the news wire like this bogus study was.   -  Nothing like politicized "science"

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New Johns Hopkins study shows digital tools help prevent obesity in high-risk young children