A recent study by U.S. researchers, currently available on the bioRxiv* preprint server, indicates that the recombination events among the viral strains of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are already occurring – however, considering current levels of viral genetic diversity, they are neither widespread nor readily detectable.
Since the start of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the causative virus SARS-CoV-2 has been under intense research and epidemiological scrutiny. The latter is important primarily due to the potential of viral recombination, which can result in viral genotypes with modified phenotypic characteristics – including altered transmissibility, pathogenicity, and virulence.
But even though the propensity for recombination among the wider group of Betacoronaviruses is well established, SARS-CoV-2 has been circulating in humans for only eight months, which means there was a relatively short window of opportunity for the rise of recombination.
In addition, a rather small number of polymorphic, phylogenetically informative sites in the SARS-CoV-2 genome implies that detecting recombinant genomes is cumbersome and highly dependent on the identity of the parent clades. Despite these drawbacks, two studies have already reported recombinants among different SARS-CoV-2 strains.
This is why researchers from Emory University and Emory-UGA Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS) in Atlanta (United States) decided to revisit these findings by utilizing a new analysis approach in order to elucidate potential recombination within SARS-CoV-2.
The clade structure of SARS-CoV-2 is structured predominantly by 37 clade-defining SNPs. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on the General Time Reversible model with invariant sites of 9783 high quality unique genome sequences with <1% Ns. 14 monophyletic clades were identified manually. These clades generally correspond to SARS-CoV-2 clades defined in Nextstrain (Hadfield et al., 2018), although a fraction of them are at higher resolution than Nextstrain clades. Clades defined here are named by Nextstrain clade designation (e.g., 20B) followed by a subclade number (e.g., -1). Scale bar is in substitutions per site. (B) Pairwise differences between the clade-defining SNP profiles of all 14 clades. (C) Location and nucleotide identity of clade-defining SNPs and (D) their frequency among SARS-CoV-2 genomes.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
A systematic four-step approach
This study employed a four-step approach to pinpoint recombinant SARS-CoV-2 genomes. First, mutations that define the clonal pattern of inheritance were characterized, followed by the identification of genomes that violate this pattern. Then the researchers identified and refined the boundaries of genetic transfer and finally assessed the plausibility of transfer by determining potential co-circulation of predicted parental clades.
All genomes were downloaded from the GISAID genome databases and subsequently filtered to exclude low-quality sequences. Furthermore, genomes were aligned in accordance with the NCBI reference sequence genome using a multiple sequence alignment program known as MAFFT.
Clades were identified as monophyletic groups situated within a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree built from 9,783 unique high quality genome sequences by employing PhyML (i.e., a software package that analyzes alignments of nucleotide or amino acid sequences in a phylogenetic framework with the use of modern statistical approaches).
In order to visualize the empirical support for recombination, the researchers have performed phylogenetic analysis on subsets of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome, which correlate to stretches of the genome bounded by inferred regions of transfer.
They next aimed to appraise, based on geographic considerations, the feasibility of required transfer events between the predicted parental clades to generate the recombinants that were observed in this study. The results they have obtained were rather insightful.
Recombination in five SARS-CoV-2 genomes
"In total, we screened 47,390 unique genomes and identified five genomes that are strong candidates for having evolved through recombination between two distantly related parental clade", say study authors in their bioRxiv paper.
Nevertheless, the fraction of recombinant genomes in the set of analyzed sequences was exceptionally low (i.e., 0.007%), which is in line with previous reports that have found no steadfast evidence of widespread recombination among SARS-CoV-2 genomes.
In any case, the sequences were linked to infections from the United States, United Kingdom and from China; furthermore, each of these genomes harbors phylogenetic markers of two distinct SARS-CoV-2 clades, and each recombinant genome was found to cluster tightly with the predicted parent clades across the regions of transfer.
Considering the latter, the predicted parent clades of aforementioned recombinant genomes were (with one exception) reported to be co-circulating in the country of infection in the two weeks before to the sample collection process.
"By identifying the nucleotide changes that underpin the clonal phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2, we established criteria for identifying putative recombinant genomes, and for evaluating their plausibility", study authors explain the practical aspects of their results.
The need to monitor high-fitness recombinants
"Ultimately, our results suggest that recombination between SARS-CoV-2 strains is occurring, but these chimeric genotypes remain rare", say study authors. "As the pandemic continues to expand, the population genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 will increase, making it easier to detect recombinant genomes", they add.
The recombinant genomes the researchers have identified in this study may not belong to persistent, larger recombinant lineages. Instead, they may represent fleeting observations into lineages that were not successfully established or have gone extinct.
But the growing number of mutations will also increase the possibility that recombinant genomes exhibit modified phenotypic characteristics that can impact fitness. On the other hand, transmission heterogeneity means there is a much lower chance for any given viral infection to form a persisting lineage.
In short, since this study shows that recombination is already taking place in SARS-CoV-2, real-time analyzes and increased surveillance endeavors (such as this one) should be encouraged in order to monitor the circulation and possible spread of high-fitness recombinant viral genotypes.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Journal references:
- Preliminary scientific report.
Vanlnsberghe, D., Neish, A.S., Lowen, A.C. & Koelle, K. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant genomes. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.05.238386.
- Peer reviewed and published scientific report.
VanInsberghe, David, Andrew S Neish, Anice C Lowen, and Katia Koelle. 2021. “Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Circulated at Low Levels over the First Year of the Pandemic.” Virus Evolution, June. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veab059. https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/7/2/veab059/6299358.
Article Revisions
- Mar 23 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.