1st human data for Sinovac's SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac vaccine is out

A group of Chinese researchers recently conducted a phase 2 clinical trial to further evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine known as CoronaVac. The results are currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server and demonstrate that the vaccine is well tolerated and without any notable dose-related safety concerns, which opens the door for phase 3 clinical trial.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continues to affect the health and change lifestyles of people around the world. Many argue that there will be no return to normalcy without an effective vaccine.

As a result, in August 2020, there were more than 231 vaccine candidates in development, and at least 24 of them progressed to clinical trials. Currently, there are 18 of them in phase 1-2, while 6 are beginning with phase 3.

The inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine developed by Sinovac Life Sciences Co. Ltd. from China (also known as CoronaVac) has been shown to be safe in preclinical trials. It could also induce SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies in rats, mice, and nonhuman primates.

And since no safety concerns have been found in phase 1 clinical trial with CoronaVac, a research group led by Dr. Yanjun Zhang from the Department of Microbiology, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Hangzhou (China) conducted a phase 2 clinical trial.

Incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups in phase 2. (A) The incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups with a Day 0,14 schedule. (B) The incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups with a Day 0,28 schedule.
Incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups in phase 2. (A) The incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups with a Day 0,14 schedule. (B) The incidence rates of adverse reactions among different groups with a Day 0,28 schedule.

Trial design and oversight

The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in order to appraise the optimal dosage, safety, and immunogenicity of the CoronaVac vaccine. A total of 600 healthy adults aged 18-59 years were included in the study.

Participants were randomly assigned into three groups (i.e., in a ratio of 2:2:1) to receive two injections of the tested vaccine at a dose of 3 μg/0.5 mL or 6 μg/0.5mL, or placebo on Day 0,14 schedule or Day 0,28 schedule.

For safety evaluation, all solicited and unsolicited adverse events were collected after each vaccination within 7 days and 28 days, respectively. Immediate adverse events were also assessed on-site for at least 30 minutes after each vaccine administration.

To evaluate the immune response, blood samples were collected from each participant at different time points. The ability of the antibodies to bind the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay while neutralizing antibody titers were measured with the use of a modified cytopathogenic effect assay.

Favorable safety and immunogenicity profile

"This trial demonstrated that the 2 doses of different dosage of CoronaVac were well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults aged 18-59 years", say study authors. "The incidence rates of adverse reactions in the 6 μg and 3 μg groups were comparable, indicating that there was no dose-related aggravating concern on safety", they add.

Moreover, there were no serious adverse events related to the vaccine, and most reported side effects were generally mild (with pain at the injection site as the most frequently reported symptom). In a nutshell, the safety profile of CoronaVac is similar to that observed in phase 1 clinical trial.

Conversely, immune responses that were elicited in phase 2 were superior to those recorded in phase 1, revealing seroconversion rates over 90%. Furthermore, after two-dose vaccination, immune responses induced by Day 0,28 schedule were above the value of Day 0,14 schedule – regardless of the vaccine dosage.

When antibody levels were compared between different age groups, it should be emphasized that the neutralizing antibody titers dropped significantly with increasing age. These results are highly consistent with epidemiological trends observed in patients with COVID-19.

Towards the phase 3 clinical trial

"Favorable safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac was demonstrated on both schedules and both dosages, which support the conduction of phase 3 trial with optimum schedule/dosage per different scenarios", highlight study authors in their medRxiv paper.

Compared with other COVID-19 vaccine contenders, the incidence rate of fever was relatively low in this clinical trial, further indicating that CoronaVac was actually well tolerated.

Hence, the next priority for the researchers is to evaluate the protective efficacy of the 3 μg dosage under Day 0,14 schedule. Likewise, the researchers state in the paper that day 0,28 schedule with 3 μg vaccine will also be adopted in the future phase 3 clinical trial. These results are eagerly expected.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Feb 22 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Tomislav Meštrović

Written by

Dr. Tomislav Meštrović

Dr. Tomislav Meštrović is a medical doctor (MD) with a Ph.D. in biomedical and health sciences, specialist in the field of clinical microbiology, and an Assistant Professor at Croatia's youngest university - University North. In addition to his interest in clinical, research and lecturing activities, his immense passion for medical writing and scientific communication goes back to his student days. He enjoys contributing back to the community. In his spare time, Tomislav is a movie buff and an avid traveler.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Meštrović, Tomislav. (2023, February 22). 1st human data for Sinovac's SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac vaccine is out. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200811/1st-human-data-for-Sinovacs-SARS-CoV-2-CoronaVac-vaccine-is-out.aspx.

  • MLA

    Meštrović, Tomislav. "1st human data for Sinovac's SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac vaccine is out". News-Medical. 21 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200811/1st-human-data-for-Sinovacs-SARS-CoV-2-CoronaVac-vaccine-is-out.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Meštrović, Tomislav. "1st human data for Sinovac's SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac vaccine is out". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200811/1st-human-data-for-Sinovacs-SARS-CoV-2-CoronaVac-vaccine-is-out.aspx. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Meštrović, Tomislav. 2023. 1st human data for Sinovac's SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac vaccine is out. News-Medical, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200811/1st-human-data-for-Sinovacs-SARS-CoV-2-CoronaVac-vaccine-is-out.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Cleveland Clinic presents new findings on triple-negative breast cancer vaccine