Plant-produced COVID-19 vaccine shows potent immunogenic profile in humans

An interim report on a phase 2 clinical trial indicates both the safety and efficacy of a plant-produced virus-like particle vaccine candidate against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The vaccine candidate has shown an acceptable safety profile and high potency in inducing humoral and cellular immune responses in adults (18 – 64 years) and elderly (65 years and above) individuals. The report is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server.

Background

With over 164 million infected people and 3.41 million deaths recorded, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impose severe burdens on the global healthcare and economic sectors.  COVID-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2, an enveloped RNA virus, which shares more than 50% sequence similarity with other lethal members of the human coronavirus family, such as SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS).

Although many potential vaccines have been developed to control the pandemic, there remains concern about the effectiveness of these vaccines against newly emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 with higher infectivity and virulence. To negate the immune evading ability of SARS-CoV-2 variants, it is thus necessary to develop new vaccines or modify existing vaccines to make them suitable for novel variants.     

In the ongoing Phase 2/3 randomized, placebo-controlled study, the scientists have investigated the safety profile and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate developed by a Canadian biotechnology company Medicago.

About the vaccine candidate

The vaccine candidate comprises a self-assembling coronavirus-like particle that displays trimers of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein embedded into the lipid bilayer of nanoparticles. The virus-like particles closely mimic the native structure of SARS-CoV-2 and are produced in the plant Nicotiana benthamiana (colloquially known as benth or benthi).

Nicotiana benthamiana. Image Credit: Hanjo Hellmann / Shutterstock
Nicotiana benthamiana. Image Credit: Hanjo Hellmann / Shutterstock

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

To improve vaccine efficiency, the oil-in-water Adjuvant System 03 (AS03) was used. After immunization, the adjuvant triggers a transient innate immune response in peripheral blood, which in turn strengthens the induction of humoral and cellular adaptive immune responses to the vaccine antigen.  

Study design

The study was conducted on 306 adults aged 18 – 64 years and 282 older adults aged 65 years and above. The participants were administered 2 doses of the candidate vaccine at an interval of 21 days.

The safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the vaccine were assessed in the study. The immunogenic efficacy was determined on the basis of neutralizing antibody responses and interferon- and IL-4-related cellular immune responses.

Important observations

Safety and tolerability

Although the vaccine was well-tolerated in both study populations, a mild reactogenicity was observed among older adults.

After the 1st and 2nd vaccine doses, local adverse events were observed in 94% and 88% of adults, respectively. Among older adults, 61% and 54% reported local adverse events after the 1st and 2nd vaccine doses, respectively. In both study populations, the most common local adverse event after the 2nd dose was pain at the injection site. Similarly, the most common systemic adverse events were fatigue and muscle aches.    

The majority of adverse events observed in participants were mild or moderate in intensity. Moreover, the symptoms typically subsided between 24 hours and 3 days. None of the participants showed any signs of vaccine-associated enhanced disease, anaphylaxis, or potential immune disorders.

Antibody response

Compared to placebo-treated control participants, about 44% of vaccinated adults and 31% of vaccinated older adults showed a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody response 21 days after the 1st dose. A relatively lower immune response observed in older adults after the 1st dose disappeared with the 2nd vaccine dose, wherein no significant difference in average antibody titer was observed between adults and older adults 21 days after the 2nd dose.

Importantly, a 10-fold higher neutralizing antibody titer was observed in vaccinated participants compared to that in COVID-19 recovered individuals.

Among study participants, 1.5% were seropositive at baseline. In these participants, antibody titers increased significantly 21 days after receiving the 1st vaccine dose. However, only a moderate increase in antibody titer was observed after the 2nd dose in seropositive participants.

Cellular immune response

In both study groups, a significant induction in interferon immune response was observed 21 days after the 1st dose, which further increased after the 2nd dose. After 1st and 2nd vaccine doses, adults exhibited more robust interferon responses than older adults.

After the 1st dose, detectable IL-4 responses were observed in 35% of adults and 17% of older adults. However, after the 2nd dose, IL-4 responses were observed in 94% of adults and 75% of older adults.

Study significance

The study findings reveal that the candidate vaccine with adjuvant system 03 is well-tolerated in humans. Importantly, a two-dose regimen of the vaccine is capable of inducing robust antibody-mediated and cell-mediated immune responses among individuals aged 18 – 88 years.  

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta

Written by

Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta

Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta is a science communicator who believes in spreading the power of science in every corner of the world. She has a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree and a Master's of Science (M.Sc.) in biology and human physiology. Following her Master's degree, Sanchari went on to study a Ph.D. in human physiology. She has authored more than 10 original research articles, all of which have been published in world renowned international journals.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. (2021, May 20). Plant-produced COVID-19 vaccine shows potent immunogenic profile in humans. News-Medical. Retrieved on October 31, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210520/Plant-produced-COVID-19-vaccine-shows-potent-immunogenic-profile-in-humans.aspx.

  • MLA

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. "Plant-produced COVID-19 vaccine shows potent immunogenic profile in humans". News-Medical. 31 October 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210520/Plant-produced-COVID-19-vaccine-shows-potent-immunogenic-profile-in-humans.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. "Plant-produced COVID-19 vaccine shows potent immunogenic profile in humans". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210520/Plant-produced-COVID-19-vaccine-shows-potent-immunogenic-profile-in-humans.aspx. (accessed October 31, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. 2021. Plant-produced COVID-19 vaccine shows potent immunogenic profile in humans. News-Medical, viewed 31 October 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210520/Plant-produced-COVID-19-vaccine-shows-potent-immunogenic-profile-in-humans.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Houston Methodist researchers join national consortium to develop herpesvirus vaccine