Study shows that natural selection can reverse evolution through sexual selection

Natural selection can reverse evolution that occurs through sexual selection and this can lead to better females, new research shows.

The study - led by the University of Exeter and Okayama University - examined broad-horned flour beetles, whose males have exaggerated mandibles, while females do not.

Male beetles with the largest mandibles win more fights and mate with more females - an example of "sexual selection", where certain characteristics (like a male peacock's tail) improve mating success.

However, having bigger mandibles requires a masculinised body (large head and neck), and a smaller abdomen - which, for females, limits the number of eggs they can carry. A masculinised body is not good for females.

Experimentally enhanced natural selection through predation, however, targets the same males favoured by sexual selection and this results in the evolution of less masculinised bodies and better-quality females.

In the study, broad-horned flour beetles were exposed to a predator called the assassin bug, which ate males with the largest mandibles.

By removing these males, predation effectively reduced the benefits of sexual selection and this means natural selection has an increased impact.

After eight generations of this, females produced about 20% more offspring across their lifespan, compared to a control group of beetles where large-horned males were not removed by predation.

Males and females of every species share genes, but in some cases - including broad-horned flour beetles - the genes good for one sex aren't always ideal for the other."

David Hosken, Professor, University of Exeter

"We see this process, known as intralocus sexual conflict, across the natural world.

"For example, humans share the genes for hips - which males need for walking, and females need for both walking and childbirth.

"Optimal hips for women would be broad enough to allow childbirth, while optimal hip width for men is narrower.

"Humans reach a sort of evolutionary compromise, in which neither males nor females get the body shape that would be optimal for them."

Professor Hosken added: "Our findings show that sexual selection favouring large-horned males drags female body shape away from the female optima.

"This study helps us understand two evolutionary tug of wars, one between natural and sexual selection and the other that takes place over body shape and characteristics shared between the sexes."

Source:
Journal reference:

Okada, K., et al. (2021) Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait. Nature Communications. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23804-7.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Professor Nancy Ip: Pioneering New Paths in Neurodegenerative Therapy