A review of drugs harmful in COVID-19

In a new study published on the preprint server medRxiv*, researchers investigate a number of drugs that are believed to potentially worsen outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To this end, the researchers used a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis approach to identify and assess any potentially deleterious drug groups in COVID-19 susceptibility and prognosis.

Study: Deleterious drugs in COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. Image Credit: VonaUA / Shutterstock.com

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Interestingly, when looking for these drugs, the researchers found that individuals on prior medication with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-II-receptor blockers (ARBs) required little care when infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2), which is the causative agent of COVID-19.

Taken together, none of the drugs assessed in the current study increased the severity of related afflictions with COVID-19. The study reports there was minimal high quality or consistent evidence showing that any of the drug groups increased susceptibility, severity, or mortality in COVID-19.

Background

Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has infected over 231 million individuals and caused over 4.74 million deaths globally. Along with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), SARS-CoV-2 is one of three zoonotic human beta coronaviruses that has emerged in the last 20 years.

SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 enter the human host cell via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor present on the surface of host cells. As a result, ACE2 has received renewed attention as a possible target for anti-viral therapeutics. To this end, it has been hypothesized that drugs that upregulate ACE2 may increase the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Many studies observed that a number of drugs alter the progression of COVID-19 in both positive and negative ways. For example, negative effects of drugs can increase the likelihood of COVID-19 patients developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS),  require mechanical ventilation (MV), or complications such as multi-organ failure, often requiring intensive care unit (ICU) in severe cases.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants, ACEIs, and ARBs have been in use to treat COVID-19 with conflicting inferences and observations. Additionally, scientific papers published prior to peer review rushed in a lot of information, which led to questions on their scientific validity.

In this context, the current study sheds light on understanding the gaps in the research and notes the effects of the drugs in COVID-19.

“We aimed to identify, critically appraise and synthesize the evidence on drugs which may be deleterious in COVID-19."

About the study

In the current study, the researchers performed a rapid systematic review of primary studies investigating drugs identified as potentially deleterious. To this end, Medline, Embase, and WHO (World Health Organization) COVID-19 database, and NIH iSearch COVID-19 portfolio were used to find papers and preprints for the study, using the Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, Study (PECOS) format.

Because new research on this topic is published at an exponential rate, the researchers adopted a rapid review methodology following the Cochrane rapid review protocol, with the aim of producing reliable results in a timely fashion.

First, the researchers tried to amass a list of drugs hypothesized as potentially harmful in COVID-19. Second, they used terms to capture evidence in the WHO database related to all the drugs identified. Primary outcomes were defined as direct measures of susceptibility to infection, disease severity, and mortality.

Overall, the researchers identified 63 papers with primary data related to these drugs. Of these, 49 papers measured at least one primary outcome included in the study. Notably, 51% of these papers were from China.

Principal findings

The researchers identified eight drug groups that were hypothesized to be deleterious in COVID-19. These comprised ACEIs, ARBs, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MCRAs), NSAIDs, statins, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

This study suggests that individuals without COVID-19 should not discontinue their medications to reduce their risk of contracting the virus, as there is no evidence for this. Similarly, immunosuppressants should also be not stopped, as they may lead to a flare of the person’s underlying condition, which can result in an increased risk of infection.

“Furthermore, the withdrawal of any necessary medications could cause harm from the disease the drug was being used to treat, as well as from a potentially severe form of COVID-19 for people with hypertension and diabetes who are already at increased risk.”

ACEIs and ARBs together are referred to as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers (RAASBs). Individuals on RAASBs were found to have quick viral clearance and reduced hospital stay. The study also highlighted the gaps in the research, such as the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and mortality data for NSAIDs, immunosuppressants, and long-term steroid use.

While discussing the best available evidence obtained in this study, the researchers also highlighted the limitations here, most of which stemmed from the quick publications and rapid analysis methodologies.

*Important notice: medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Dr. Ramya Dwivedi

Written by

Dr. Ramya Dwivedi

Ramya has a Ph.D. in Biotechnology from the National Chemical Laboratories (CSIR-NCL), in Pune. Her work consisted of functionalizing nanoparticles with different molecules of biological interest, studying the reaction system and establishing useful applications.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dwivedi, Ramya. (2021, September 26). A review of drugs harmful in COVID-19. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210926/A-review-of-drugs-harmful-in-COVID-19.aspx.

  • MLA

    Dwivedi, Ramya. "A review of drugs harmful in COVID-19". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210926/A-review-of-drugs-harmful-in-COVID-19.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Dwivedi, Ramya. "A review of drugs harmful in COVID-19". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210926/A-review-of-drugs-harmful-in-COVID-19.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dwivedi, Ramya. 2021. A review of drugs harmful in COVID-19. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210926/A-review-of-drugs-harmful-in-COVID-19.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Public trust in COVID-19 vaccine science influences vaccine uptake in the US