Non-severe COVID-19 may elicit more durable memory B cell response than severe COVID-19

Although highly effective vaccines have minimized the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in countries with access to COVID-19 vaccines, most of the global population still has limited access to these vaccines and remain at elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 (re)infection can be acquired by both vaccination and natural infection. Although vaccines elicit higher antibody titers and a more diverse immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared to natural infection, longitudinal studies conducted in unvaccinated individuals recovered from COVID-19 suggest that natural immunity acquired from infection is maintained for nearly one year after infection. Furthermore, these natural immune responses also protect the individuals from subsequent re-infection, as SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits a powerful B cell response, which results in the generation of long-lasting plasma cells and memory B cells.

Since many people across the world have limited access to vaccines, it is crucial to understand the immune response induced by natural infection and the impact of severity of disease on the durability of natural immunity.

Determining the impact of COVID-19 severity on memory B cell response

A recent study conducted by researchers from the US aimed to measure the impact of severity of COVID-19 on memory B cell response and characterize changes in the memory B cell compartment during the period between recovery and five months after symptom onset. This study is available on the bioRxiv* preprint server.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

The researchers used high-parameter spectral flow cytometry to analyze the phenotype of memory B cells reactive against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 or the spike receptor-binding domain in COVID-19 recovered individuals. As a result, eight individuals were hospitalized with non-severe COVID-19, and five were hospitalized with severe disease.

One month after the onset of symptoms, a significant proportion of spike-specific IgG+ B cells had an activated phenotype. Spike-specific IgG+ B cells from individuals who had non-severe COVID-19 showed increased expression of markers linked to durable B cell memory such as T-bet, CD11c, and FcRL5. This increased expression of markers was not observed in individuals who had severe disease.

Five months after symptom onset, most of the spike-specific memory B cells had a resting phenotype, and the proportion of spike-specific T-bet+ IgG+ memory B cells decreased to baseline levels. Overall, the results show that non-severe COVID-19 can elicit better memory B cell response than severe COVID-19.

“The increased percentage of B cells associated with long-lived immunity in non-severe COVID-19 patients may have consequences for long-term immunity against SARS-CoV-2 re-infection or severity of the resulting disease.”

Findings show that patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 develop different memory B cell response

According to the authors, although this study was conducted in a relatively small number of individuals, it reiterated many of the findings reported earlier from larger cohorts. It confirmed the loss of IgM+ and IgA+ spike-specific memory B cells, anti-spike and anti-RBD plasma IgM, and the maintenance of IgG+ spike-specific memory B cells and anti-spike plasma IgG five months after symptom onset. They also stated that the most remarkable finding from their study is the higher proportion of spike-specific IgG+ B cells that express the transcription factor T-bet in individuals who had non-severe COVID-19 compared to those who had severe disease.

Distribution of major B cell subsets in recovered COVID-19 patients. A) Gating strategy to obtain non-antibody-secreting B cells (CD38lo) that are further divided into naïve, unswitched memory (uswM), switched memory (swM), and double negative (DN). SwM B cells were divided into activated and resting populations based on the expression of CD21. DN cells were divided into DN1 – 3 based on the expression of FcRL5 and CXCR5. B) Median percentage of each B cell subset in samples from individuals who recovered from non-severe COVID-19 and severe COVID-19. C) Percentage of unswitched memory B cells, which was increased in individuals who recovered from severe disease as compared to those who had non-severe COVID-19. D) Median proportions of the three different DN populations 1 month after non-severe or severe disease. In panel B – D, results are shown for individuals who recovered from non-severe COVID-19 (n = 8) and severe COVID-19 (n = 5). See Figure S1 for graphs with individual data points for the data shown in panels B and D. * P < 0.05
Distribution of major B cell subsets in recovered COVID-19 patients. A) Gating strategy to obtain non-antibody-secreting B cells (CD38lo) that are further divided into naïve, unswitched memory (uswM), switched memory (swM), and double-negative (DN). SwM B cells were divided into activated and resting populations based on the expression of CD21. DN cells were divided into DN1 – 3 based on the expression of FcRL5 and CXCR5. B) Median percentage of each B cell subset in samples from individuals who recovered from non-severe COVID-19 and severe COVID-19. C) Percentage of unswitched memory B cells, which was increased in individuals who recovered from severe disease as compared to those who had non-severe COVID-19. D) Median proportions of the three different DN populations 1 month after non-severe or severe disease. In panel B – D, results are shown for individuals who recovered from non-severe COVID-19 (n = 8) and severe COVID-19 (n = 5). See Figure S1 for graphs with individual data points for the data shown in panels B and D. * P < 0.05

While previous studies observed that a higher percentage of total CD19+ T-bet+ IgG1+ B cells was linked to shorter symptom duration, this study showed that this association predominantly involves SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific B cells which indicate the development of B cell memory.

To conclude, the observations from this study show that patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 disease develop memory B cell response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein differently. Individuals who recovered from non-severe disease had more spike-specific B cells that express B-cell markers associated with durable immunity, characterized by T-bet, CD11c, and FcRL5 expression, and low CD21 expression.

“These data aid in the understanding of naturally acquired B cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 and help characterize the B cell populations that may be responsible for durable, long-lived immunity.”

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Apr 29 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Susha Cheriyedath

Written by

Susha Cheriyedath

Susha is a scientific communication professional holding a Master's degree in Biochemistry, with expertise in Microbiology, Physiology, Biotechnology, and Nutrition. After a two-year tenure as a lecturer from 2000 to 2002, where she mentored undergraduates studying Biochemistry, she transitioned into editorial roles within scientific publishing. She has accumulated nearly two decades of experience in medical communication, assuming diverse roles in research, writing, editing, and editorial management.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. (2023, April 29). Non-severe COVID-19 may elicit more durable memory B cell response than severe COVID-19. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210930/Non-severe-COVID-19-may-elicit-more-durable-memory-B-cell-response-than-severe-COVID-19.aspx.

  • MLA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "Non-severe COVID-19 may elicit more durable memory B cell response than severe COVID-19". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210930/Non-severe-COVID-19-may-elicit-more-durable-memory-B-cell-response-than-severe-COVID-19.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "Non-severe COVID-19 may elicit more durable memory B cell response than severe COVID-19". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210930/Non-severe-COVID-19-may-elicit-more-durable-memory-B-cell-response-than-severe-COVID-19.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Cheriyedath, Susha. 2023. Non-severe COVID-19 may elicit more durable memory B cell response than severe COVID-19. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210930/Non-severe-COVID-19-may-elicit-more-durable-memory-B-cell-response-than-severe-COVID-19.aspx.

Comments

  1. Matrim Cauthon Matrim Cauthon United States says:

    I wonder whether they have it backwards: maybe in the people who had a less severe case of the covid, that was because they had “better memory B cell response” than the people who had severe COVID-19. It seems thoroughly counter-intuitive to think that when the disease lasts longer and causes more severe symptoms (giving our immune system more time to adapt and learn how to kill the virus) we develop less immunity than when the disease is shorter and less severe. Perhaps we could learn more, by looking for any correlation between immune response to the Covid and other factors such as the patient’s age, that might be the cause of a difference in the ability of the immune system to respond.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Researchers discover how mutations disrupt protein splicing and cause disease