High nasopharyngeal viral load in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-induced infection

By Sangeeta PaulReviewed by Danielle Ellis, B.Sc.Feb 23 2022

In a recent study posted to the Research Square* pre-print server, a team of researchers from Italy and the United States (US) retrospectively reviewed and compared viral load in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron and previous SARS-CoV-2 strain-induced infection.

Short Report: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection is associated with high nasopharyngeal viral load. Image Credit: zstock / Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

The World Health Organization (WHO) in December 2021 declared five SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) - Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron. The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was first detected on 24 November 2021 in South Africa. Due to its higher transmissibility, this variant spread at a rapid rate and became the most dominant variant worldwide in January 2022.

Previous studies suggested that a higher transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is due to the higher emission breath rate of viral particles in patients infected with this variant. However, this inference is intriguingly speculative as there is no direct comparison of viral load between different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

This study is conducted to provide a direct differentiation of viral load in the nasopharyngeal specimen of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and former SARS-CoV-2 variants in Italy.

Study design

The present study subjects were tested COVID-19-positive patients who have undergone SARS-CoV-2 testing in Pederzoli Hospital of Peschiera del Garda, Italy, during 3-9 January 2021, and 3-9 January 2022, characterizing the high prevalence of Alpha (> 95%) and Omicron variants (>90%), respectively.

The SARS-CoV-2 viral load was estimated using the same procedure and instrumentation (SARS-CoV-2 Seegene Allplex Assay) during the said duration of both years. Using this real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, cumulative viral load from the nasopharyngeal swab was measured and expressed as the cycle threshold (Ct) value of different SARS-CoV-2 genes.

Findings

The researchers observed a total of 47 and 118 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients in January 2021 and January 2022, respectively. In 2021, the majority of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects were older (63 years, median age) as compared to the subjects in 2022 (42 years median age). At the same time, sex distribution in both periods was similar, with 68% female in 2021 and 58% in 2022.

At the time of the high prevalence of the Omicron variant in January 2022, Ct values were significantly lower (median Ct value- 27.5) as compared to the Ct value in January 2021 (median Ct value- 31.8) when the Alpha variant was predominant.

Importantly, the team noted that in January 2022, there was a two-fold higher rate of subjects (45 out of 118) with increased nasopharyngeal viral load (< 25 Ct values) as compared to the subjects from January 2021 (10 out of 47; odds ratio 2.28).

Conclusion

The findings of this research demonstrated that patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant released aerosols that contain higher viral load as compared to the patients infected with former SARS-CoV-2 strains.

This study provides a valid biological reason to support previous reports on the high transmission rate of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and the increased prevalence of symptoms related to upper respiratory tract infections due to this variant.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources