How effective is mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma patients?

Since the beginning of the pandemic, governments and healthcare experts have been warning that 'at-risk' individuals stand to suffer far more from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than generally healthy individuals, and they show a far higher chance of progressing to severe disease, hospitalization and death.

Study: Impact of Omicron variant on the response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in multiple myeloma. Image Credit: David A Litman/Shutterstock
Study: Impact of Omicron variant on the response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in multiple myeloma. Image Credit: David A Litman/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

While vaccination has significantly reduced these risks for healthy individuals as well as many 'at-risk' groups, many are still unsure of the level of protection that the vaccine offers the immunocompromised.

Researchers from the University of Parma have been investigating the protection offered by the vaccine in patients suffering from multiple myeloma, and have posted their results to the medRxiv* preprint server.

Background

Only patients from the Hematology Unit of Parma Hospital were eligible for inclusion within the study. A total of 40 patients suffering from multiple myeloma (MM) consented to be part of the study - six of these suffered from monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS),10 were smoldering myeloma (SM) patients, and the remaining 24 were either newly diagnosed MM (MMD) or relapsed-refractory MM (MMR). The researchers gathered peripheral blood (PB) samples before the first dose of the vaccine, and then two weeks after the second dose. Individuals were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Sixteen patients with MM were also given a heterologous booster dose using the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, and blood samples were taken again 14 days after this.

Two patients had to be excluded from the final analysis, one who showed pre-existing antibodies, and one who caught COVID-19 during the study. The patients showed an overall seropositivity rate of 86.8% for anti-spike IgG antibodies. Five patients showed no detectable antibodies. All five of these had immunoparesis in 2/3 Ig classes, which was associated with lower spike-IgG-Abs. Generally, the researchers found that MMR patients tended to show much lower antibody titers compared to the other disease variants.

Pseudovirus neutralization assays examining the response to the vaccine homologous spike protein showed that MMR patients also had significantly lower neutralizing antibody titers compared to patients suffering MGUS, SMM and MMD. Out of a total of six patients that showed no detectable neutralization titer, five were MMR patients. These pseudovirus neutralization assays were then expanded to test the patients’ sera ability to neutralize different variants spike proteins, including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron. Significant correlations between the levels of antibody initially detected in the sera and the neutralization titers indicate that the vaccines retain at least a certain amount of efficacy against the variants in these patients. MGUS patients appeared to show the most significant reductions in neutralizing antibody titers for the Beta and Omicron variants, while SMM and MMD patients showed generally decreased Nab titers to all variants. MMR patients showed even lower responses to Beta, Delta and Omicron variants than they did to the initial Wuhan-Hu-1 spike protein.

When examining the responses to the booster vaccine in the 16 MM patients, it became clear that MMR patients still show significantly lower responses than MMD patients. However, the booster does still appear to have a beneficial effect, with six out of seven MMD patients showing improved spike-IgG-Abs levels, and three out of five seropositive MMR patients showing improvement. Even more telling, half of the MMR patients who registered as seronegative following the second vaccine dose underwent seroconversion. While MMR patients showed no significant improvement in neutralizing antibody titer following the booster, MMD patients did. This was seen against all spike proteins, including Omicron, for MMD patients, while MMR patients showed improved titers against the Alpha, Gamma and Delta variants, but not the Beta or Omicron variants. However, four MMR patients who previously showed no detectable titers against the Omicron variants reached detectable levels following the booster.

Conclusion

The authors highlight that they have successfully shown that MM patients with (MMR) have reduced spike-specific antibody levels as well as neutralizing titers following full mRNA vaccination, and that this was seen for all variants analyzed.

They also showed that booster immunization can help to alleviate the reduced response to vaccines in newly diagnosed MM patients and in some MMR patients. Omicron in particular shows a significant threat to MMR patients. This information could be critical for healthcare workers, multiple myeloma patients, and specialists and could help inform these individuals of the specifics of the risk they face.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 11 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Sam Hancock

Written by

Sam Hancock

Sam completed his MSci in Genetics at the University of Nottingham in 2019, fuelled initially by an interest in genetic ageing. As part of his degree, he also investigated the role of rnh genes in originless replication in archaea.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Hancock, Sam. (2023, May 11). How effective is mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma patients?. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220302/How-effective-is-mRNA-vaccination-in-multiple-myeloma-patients.aspx.

  • MLA

    Hancock, Sam. "How effective is mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma patients?". News-Medical. 21 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220302/How-effective-is-mRNA-vaccination-in-multiple-myeloma-patients.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Hancock, Sam. "How effective is mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma patients?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220302/How-effective-is-mRNA-vaccination-in-multiple-myeloma-patients.aspx. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Hancock, Sam. 2023. How effective is mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma patients?. News-Medical, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220302/How-effective-is-mRNA-vaccination-in-multiple-myeloma-patients.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
SARS-CoV-2 hijacks cholesterol trafficking to fuel infection and evade immune responses