Frail and older males more vulnerable to COVID-19 than females

By Tarun Sai LomteReviewed by Aimee MolineuxMar 17 2022

In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* preprint server, researchers evaluated the association of biological sex, frailty, and age with the vaccine-elicited immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Many disparities in SARS-CoV-2 infections were observed among older adults early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The phase III clinical trials of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 revealed high efficacy in the older population. However, such trials often under-represent the frailest and most aged people.

Some vaccination studies on the residents of long-term care facilities have identified old age as a risk factor for the poor elicitation of antibodies. Moreover, males have been predicted to experience severe COVID-19 at older ages, and a growing number of reports indicate differential immune responses based on age and biological sex.

The study

In the present study, researchers investigated sex disparities and sex-specific aging effects in the humoral immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strain and its variants of concern (VOCs). The participants of the study were older adults aged 75 – 98 years. The frailty status of the participant was assessed at the pre-vaccination visit using the Fried frailty phenotype, and a baseline blood sample was collected.

Subsequently, blood specimens were collected 14-30 days post first (<1M_PD1) and second vaccinations (<1M_PD2), three (3M_PD2) and six months (6M_PD2) post second vaccine dose, and 14 – 60 days after the third or booster vaccination (1M_PD3). Younger adults working at the Johns Hopkins Health System were sampled in parallel. The comparison group participants were COVID-19-naïve individuals below the age of 75 years.

IgG responses against SARS-CoV-2 proteins like a spike (S) or its receptor-binding domain (S-RBD), and nucleocapsid (N) of the vaccine strain, VOCs like Alpha, Delta, and Omicron were measured, and the plasma antibodies' inhibition of binding between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and S protein was determined.

Results

The study initially recruited 86 adults and excluded three after detecting high N titers indicating prior infection. Another participant was ruled out due to severe immunosuppression. The median age of the participants was 84 years, and females represented 59% of the cohort. About 64% of participants were categorized as pre-frail, and frail males were more in number than females. All participants completed the primary vaccination series, and more than 70% had been boosted with a third dose. Similarly, in the younger comparison cohort, females (60%) outnumbered males, and most participants were aged 30 – 40 years.

The binding of IgG to S protein and S-RBD of the vaccine strain was high after the primary vaccination series and significantly declined in the following six months in older adults. Interestingly, females elicited more significant IgG responses than males at all timepoints. A third vaccination significantly increased the anti-S and anti-S-RBD titers in males and females. By six months post second dose, 77% of females and 79% of males had no detectable ACE2-inhibiting antibodies (ACE2iAb). Sex differences were significant three months after the second vaccination, with females still mounting more robust responses than males. Following a booster vaccination, ACE2iAb was detected in all participants except one.

The authors observed a significant association between age and reduced anti-S and anti-S-RBD IgG titers and ACE2iAb six months after primary vaccination. At 3M_PD2, the age of the participants was associated with significantly weakened immune responses in males but not in females. After the booster dose administration, the age effect was insignificant overall, suggesting that booster vaccination removed age and sex disparities in vaccine-elicited immune responses.

Moreover, frail participants had significantly weaker immune responses than pre-frail and non-frail participants. Like age, frailty was associated with impaired immunity in males but not females, and a third vaccine dose attenuated the impact of frailty.

The authors assessed the IgG responses against seasonal and epidemic beta coronaviruses and observed cross-reactive, broad humoral responses induced by COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, antibody responses were evaluated against antigens of the vaccine strain, Alpha and Delta VOCs, and compared older and younger cohorts at 6M_PD2. Anti-S IgG titers were significantly lower in older adults than young people.

The disparities between older and younger individuals were significant in males at three-time points viz, 14-, 90-, and 180-days post-vaccination, while significant in females at 14 days after vaccination. Similar results were obtained when tested against Alpha and Delta antigens.

Conclusions

The present study observed that older females exhibit more robust humoral responses against the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strain and its VOCs than males. Frailty and sex-associated differences were profound among males but not females. The sex-specific age effect was observed in both the older and younger cohort.

Booster doses eliminated these sex, age, and frailty effects in humoral responses except ACE2iAb responses, which were lower in frail adults than pre-frail or non-frail adults. In summary, age and frailty impair humoral responses after primary vaccination among older males. After a booster, the differences are eliminated, emphasizing the need for increased vaccination coverage of this subset of the population.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources