Vaccination- and/or natural infection-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants

In a recent study posted to the bioRxiv* preprint server, researchers comparatively evaluated the neutralization antibody (Ab) titers for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron VOC (variants of concern) subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/5 among individuals with ancestral B.1 (D614G) strain infections, vaccinated individuals, or with hybrid (combined) immunity from breakthrough infections (BTI) and vaccinations with Delta or Gamma VOCs.

Study: Vaccine- and BTI-elicited pre-Omicron immunity more effectively neutralizes Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 than pre-Omicron infection alone. Image Credit: Kateryna Kon/Shutterstock
Study: Vaccine- and BTI-elicited pre-Omicron immunity more effectively neutralizes Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 than pre-Omicron infection alone. Image Credit: Kateryna Kon/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Background

The continual emergence of Omicron sub-VOCs has threatened vaccine efficacy and warranted the development of novel and updated anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. It is critical to assess the cross-neutralization of immunological responses induced by either vaccination or natural infection, or both to guide policy-making and improve preparedness against COVID-19.

About the study

In the present study, researchers compared pre-Omicron BTI- and/or vaccination-induced immune responses to novel Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/5.

The team compared the neutralization ability of sera obtained from 58 unvaccinated and D614G-infected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients (convalescent sera), 14 booster-vaccinated (three doses) individuals, and 16 vaccinated and Delta-infected (n=14) or Gamma-infected (n=2) BTI patients against D614G, Delta and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/5 strains.

The unvaccinated individuals were infected between March and July 2020, and BTI patients were infected between 15 July and 20 September 2021. Triple COVID-19 vaccinees received a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) booster dose between October 2021 and January 2022. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for all patients.

Vero-E6 cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK)293T-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)- transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) cells were used for cell culture experiments. Multiplexed assays including SARS-CoV-2 antigens [nucleocapsid (N), spike (S), receptor-binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD)] and S from other CoVs [SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV), OC43, HKU1] and Influenza A Hemagglutinin H3 were used to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) Ab titers.

Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were obtained from the participants for virological assays, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed. To evaluate SARS-CoV-2 VOC and sub-VOC neutralization, live virus neutralization assays and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pseudotype-based neutralization assays were performed. The 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), and the 50% neutralizing titer (NT50) values were determined.

Results

All Omicron sub-VOCs showed extensive immune evasion from sera of all participants compared to the D614G and Delta, although to different degrees based on sera origin. BA.1. COVID-19 convalescents could not neutralize the Omicron BA.1 sub-VOC and partially neutralized Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5. Sera from vaccinated individuals partially neutralized the Omicron BA.2 sub-VOC but not BA.1 and BA.4/5.

BTI patient sera showed similar neutralizing titers for all Omicron sub-VOCs. BTI patient sera and convalescent sera showed the highest and lowest neutralizing potential for all Omicron sub-VOCs, respectively. The NT50:Ab ratios (Ab avidity) were significantly greater among BTI patients than among convalescents.

Moderate COVID-19 convalescents showed better neutralization responses. BA.1 and BA.2 showed the greatest resistance and sensitivity, respectively, against all sera. Omicron BA.5 escaped neutralization responses of vaccinated individuals better than natural infection-induced and hybrid immunity-induced responses.

Among COVID-19 convalescents, NT50 geometric mean titers (GMT) for B.1 (125) and Delta (153) were comparable. Even at 1:40 serum concentration, 33% and 39% of individuals could not neutralize Omicron B.1 and Delta, respectively. The NT50 GMTs for BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 were 55, 37, and 60, respectively, significantly lesser than those against B.1 and Delta.

BA.4 was significantly more resistant than BA.2 and BA.5 and could not be neutralized by 75% of the sera. NT50:anti-S, NT50:anti-RBD, and N50:anti-NTD ratios were similar for B.1 and Delta and were lower by one log10 micron BA.1. Among boosted vaccinees, NT50 GMT titers for B.1, Delta, BA.1, BA.4 and BA.5 were 247, 345, 51, 46 and 59, respectively.

Among BTI patients, NT50 GMTs for B.1, Gamma/Delta, Omicron BA.1 sub-VOC, BA.2 sub-VOC, BA.4 sub-VOC, and Omicron BA.5 sub-VOC were 195, 330, 44, 71, 52, and 88, respectively, and NT50:Ab ratios were one log10 greater for B.1 and Delta than for Omicron sub-VOCs. Comparing NT50 values of all sera (convalescents + vaccinees + BTI patients) showed a trend of greater Delta neutralization than B.1 and much lower (1.5 log10) Omicron sub-VOC neutralization.

Overall, the study findings underscored COVID-19 vaccination importance in generating Abs with high cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs and sub-VOCs and indicated that immunological imprinting by vaccines of the first-generation might limit, but not completely terminate cross-neutralization.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 16 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Written by

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia is an oral and maxillofacial physician and radiologist based in Pune, India. Her academic background is in Oral Medicine and Radiology. She has extensive experience in research and evidence-based clinical-radiological diagnosis and management of oral lesions and conditions and associated maxillofacial disorders.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. (2023, May 16). Vaccination- and/or natural infection-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 23, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221027/Vaccination-andor-natural-infection-induced-immune-responses-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-subvariants.aspx.

  • MLA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Vaccination- and/or natural infection-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants". News-Medical. 23 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221027/Vaccination-andor-natural-infection-induced-immune-responses-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-subvariants.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Vaccination- and/or natural infection-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221027/Vaccination-andor-natural-infection-induced-immune-responses-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-subvariants.aspx. (accessed November 23, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. 2023. Vaccination- and/or natural infection-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. News-Medical, viewed 23 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221027/Vaccination-andor-natural-infection-induced-immune-responses-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-subvariants.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Inequities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage for older adults highlighted in global study