Researchers examine how timing of cannabis exposure during pregnancy impacts fetal development

As more people use cannabis for recreational purposes, attitudes towards the drug have changed. For example, research has shown that dispensaries often recommend cannabis – also referred to as marijuana – to pregnant women to ease pregnancy symptoms, especially morning sickness.

There is a growing body of literature attesting to poor child outcomes if cannabinoids are consumed during pregnancy. The exact effects on the developing fetus, however, remain unclear. Researchers in the US have now examined how timing of cannabis exposure during pregnancy impacts fetal development.

“We show that even when marijuana use occurred only in the first trimester of pregnancy, birth weight was significant reduced, by more than 150g on average,” said Dr Beth Bailey, professor and director of population health research at Central Michigan University and senior author of the study published in Frontiers in Pediatrics. “If that use continued into the second trimester, newborn head circumference was significantly decreased as well.”

Continued exposure results in largest deficiencies

“These findings are important as newborn size is one of the strongest predictors of later child health and development,” added Dr Phoebe Dodge, the study’s first author, a recent graduate of the Central Michigan University College of Medicine and an incoming pediatric resident at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital in Cleveland.

Recent work, including the research by Dodge et al., has shown significant effects of cannabis use on newborn size.

Size deficits were largest among newborns exposed to marijuana throughout gestation.” 

Dr Beth Bailey, Professor and Director of Population Health Research, Central Michigan University

The babies born after continued in-utero exposure were nearly 200g lighter, and their head circumference was nearly 1cm less than that of babies who had not been exposed. Pregnancy cannabis use did not significantly predict newborn length in this study.

The effects the scientists observed have also shed light on patterns of use. Their study showed that occasional use, such as for first trimester morning sickness, may reduce fetal growth in the same way as continued use throughout pregnancy. The same is true for other use in early stages, including cases when someone uses cannabis not knowing they are pregnant.

Quitting before pregnancy is best recommendation

The authors pointed out that in their study they did not have information about how much or how often participants used cannabis. Their results were based on whether people did or did not use it at certain times in pregnancy. Therefore, the study could not establish if there was a connection between heavy use and more pronounced outcomes in newborn growth.

More studies are needed to determine whether timing or amount of use is most important when it comes to effects on newborn size, they wrote.

The best recommendation is that women should be advised to quit marijuana use prior to becoming pregnant” Dodge said. However, quitting as soon as possible after getting pregnant is the second-best option to avoid long term adverse health and developmental outcomes. “There are some benefits of quitting among those who begin pregnancy using marijuana,” she continued.

Source:
Journal reference:

Dodge, P., et al. (2023). The impact of timing of in utero marijuana exposure on fetal growth. Frontiers in Pediatrics. doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1103749.

Comments

  1. T K T K United States says:

    Is there any more complete reporting of this study with additional detail on confounding variables? As the journal article is written, the handling of serious potential confounds (mainly socioeconomic status, but potentially others such as tobacco, alcohol and stress) is presented more or less on a “trust me” basis.

    At the very least, it seems that the relative predictive power of those variables should be discussed alongside the study variable, both in the lit review and in the analysis. How strongly are age, socioeconomic status (income, education, ethnicity), marital status, and tobacco use related to head circumference and fetal weight, based on previous studies?

    Using the same exact data set and statistical approach for treating confounding variables, how well would those factors have predicted those same dependent variables?

    Importantly, would socio-economic status have predicted head size and fetal weight better than MJ use given the same regression approach (i.e. treating MJ use as a confounding, rather than dependent, variable)?

    How can one judge the predictive power of MJ use without any context as to effect size (in cm and grams) relative to what has been found in studies of those intuitively important variables?

    The reader has nothing to go on in this article to answer the above questions – no footnotes for studies on those other variables, no access to raw data, and no detailed discussion of the statistical techniques used (or metrics related to the strengths of relationships among any variables other than the chosen independent and dependent variables).

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.