McLean Hospital creates standing research advisory board for mental illness studies

Community engagement is important for developing research involving patients with mental illness, and funding agencies are increasingly requiring such engagement. However, many researchers are unable to pursue advisory boards with people with lived experience with mental illness, including psychotic disorders, due to financial and time constraints on the researchers and individuals who prefer limited participation burdens.

To address these gaps, McLean Hospital's Division of Psychotic Disorders created a standing research advisory board as a shared resource for researchers, that they can utilize for feedback at any phase of a research project. This novel model was designed to provide a flexible alternative to research boards created for single studies, in which board members and researchers can connect to improve the quality of their research and align with the needs of the community their research aims to serve.

A new paper published January 11th in Psychiatric Services describes five steps McLean took to form its research advisory board that the authors hope can serve as a guide for other mental illness researchers looking to engage the patient community. They include:

  1. Consult community members
  2. Define goals and scope
  3. Select board members
  4. Plan board operations
  5. Consider board sustainability

The authors also collected feedback from researchers on their experience with McLean's research advisory board, with nine of out 10 respondents saying they planned to adjust their research based on the board's feedback. Their paper also offers tips on avoiding potential conflicts of interest and details future research goals of collecting long-term outcomes data on the effectiveness of the boards.

Engaging people with lived experience with mental illness when developing research is crucial, yet many researchers do not regularly seek feedback from the community when creating and executing their studies. Developing a standing research advisory board as a shared resource will stand to benefit future research efforts and reduce some of the impractical considerations around creating an advisory board for a single study."

Julie M. McCarthy, PhD, lead study author, staff psychologist in the Division of Psychotic Disorders at McLean Hospital

Source:
Journal reference:

McCarthy, J. M., et al. (2024). Creation of a Psychotic Disorders Research Advisory Board as a Shared Resource. Psychiatric Services. doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230328.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Research links COVID-19 vaccines to temporary facial palsy in over 5,000 patients