Radiologist supply fails to keep pace with rising imaging demand

Demand for medical imaging in the U.S. keeps rising, but the number of radiologists available to read those images has barely budged relative to the population, according to a new research study published in the JACR®.

The researchers tracked the radiologist pipeline over roughly the past 15 years using four national datasets covering the residency match, accredited training programs, graduate medical education, and the practicing physician workforce. They found that radiology residency positions grew 33% between 2010 and 2025, and the total number of radiology residents grew 23% through 2024. Yet the number of radiologists actually in practice rose only 12% between 2010 and 2022, translating to a shift from 11.1 to 11.5 radiologists per 100,000 people.

According to the authors, radiology also expanded more slowly than medicine as a whole: positions grew 66% across the specialty from 2002 to 2025, compared with 89% across all specialties. According to Ajay Malhotra, MBBS, MD, MMM, Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Neurology and of Neurosurgery at Yale School of Medicine, more trainees are entering radiology, but attrition and population growth are absorbing nearly all of that gain, and the aging of the population means per capita imaging demand is climbing at the same time.

The radiologist pipeline has grown, but almost none of that growth has reached patients. After accounting for population growth, the number of radiologists per person is essentially where it was fifteen years ago, and that is before you factor in an aging population that uses more imaging per capita. For anyone waiting on a scan result, that is the number that matters."

Ajay Malhotra, MBBS, MD, MMM, Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Neurology and of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine

Source:
Journal reference:

Malhotra, A., et al. (2026). The Evolving US Radiologist Pipeline: Trends in Residency Positions, Resident Workforce, and Practicing Radiologists per Unit Population. Journal of the American College of Radiology. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2026.04.005. https://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(26)00207-3/abstract

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Why erratic step counts may matter more than your daily total