1. Neglects or ignores ECRR work on internal radioactive emitters.
    R. Ashok Kumar R. Ashok Kumar India says:
    January 22, 2012 at 2:20 AM

    This 2007 article is useful in so far as the data made available goes, but woefully inadequate in the completeness of the research interpretation. Why has this article neglected the following work which makes it clear that the ICRP model of radiation risk is not science but witchcraft? It uses external radiation models to deduce happenings within the body! Internal dose has no meaning. The smallest radiation emission within the body has distrastrous consequences. Thus the data unambiguously establishes the effects observed because the internal emitters are at the smallest level unacceptably dangerous.
    See http://deathdealersnukes.blogspot.com
    and
    2003(2010)Recommendations of the ECRR: The Health Effects of Ionising Radiation: Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes. Regulators'Edition. Ed: Chris Busby et al. European Committee on Radiation Risk. Green Audit. 2003.2010.

    Reply
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
(Logout)
Post

Terms

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

Provide Feedback