Either the tags (& the image on the email newsletter that linked me here) are way out of line... Or this article just casually glossed over the fact that the "new medicine" is nanobots? And that by targeting the specific molecule it might involve actual bioengineering & change the makeup of people's bodies?? Uhhh, call it what it actually is, please. If the tags/image are correct, then this is WAY too important & revolutionary to be so casual & deceptively low-key about it. (Scary but exciting!)

I sure hope the brave test subjects are at least informed about the nature of what they might receive (if not placebo or conventional medications). I know you don't want psychosomatic influence (though that's what the control groups are for), but for something this unprecedented (if, again, the unspoken details are accurate), they'd have the right to know, since that would be nothing like testing a new but still conventional treatment.

(Especially if it also involves bioengineering & deletion of a molecule that isn't even fully understood... That could have a major domino effect if they're not careful. So again, that's something that I REALLY hope the testers are more open about with the volunteers than this article seems to be! Maaaaan...)