1. Layman interpretation
    J B J B Colombia says:
    December 12, 2022 at 9:08 PM

    I don't want to come to any conclusions that may be inappropriate so I'll write my comments as questions to get some feedback from people who might have more expertise on the subject matter regarding this quote from the article: "Six studies included in the meta-analysis evaluated the vaccine effectiveness in a total of 251,123 individuals. The prevalence of long-COVID was estimated to be 39% among unvaccinated individuals and 37% among vaccinated individuals."

    My questions are:
    1) With an N=251,123, is a difference of 2 percentage points of self reported qualitative experience either meaningful or even statistically significant?
    2) Is it appropriate to write an article (and thanks to website SEO, have it pushed to people's personalized news feeds) celebrating a difference in qualitative experience of this magnitude?

    Reply
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
(Logout)
Post

Terms

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

Provide Feedback