1. Same flaw as the V ax trials
    Jonny Fin Jonny Fin United States says:
    June 12, 2021 at 2:29 PM

    They did not include an accurate representation of the general public.

    On top of that they concluded their efficacy after only 2 months and only used the results of about 180 participants, and didn’t test even test to see if they prevented infections (only to see if it reduced symptoms...

    So as you say “ All this adds up to a very weak study if one wants to assess the risk in the general society under normal conditions.”

    Reply
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
(Logout)
Post

Terms

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

Provide Feedback