1. Jack Jack United States says:

    This is a huge waste of resources.  This push to cut is funded by guilty people so much wanting there to be a reason to continue RIC (baby genital mutilations) in the US.  There is never a good reason to cut off erogenous tissue of any human without consent. Sucking African men into the mutilation culture with misinformation is also shameful.  The trials were flawed and even if the small risk reduction is real (about 1.6% risk change) it is a distraction from condom use and the huge risk reduction that gives.  

    Let's start with condom use and let's not make condoms that much less useful by desensitizing the genitals of men.  The only touch organ possessing as rich erogenous innervation as the foreskin is the clitoris. Circumcision deprives man of 2/3ds of the main erogenous zone constituted of the foreskin and the glans.  That natural erogenous tissue makes using a condom so much better.  Stop with the push for male genital mutilation.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.